Systems and Precision Cancer Medicine Group

Dr Anguraj Sadanandam’s Group is investigating methods to classify pancreatic-, colorectal-, breast- and multiple other cancer patients into clinically relevant subgroups.

Professor Anguraj Sadanandam

Group Leader:

Systems and Precision Cancer Medicine anguraj sandanandam

Professor Sadanandam applies the multidisciplinary experience both in the wet-lab and computational biology to identify and test personalised therapies for different cancer types.

Researchers in this group

.

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

.

Phone: +44 20 3437 6920

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

.

Location: Sutton

.

Phone: +44 20 8722 4337

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

Professor Anguraj Sadanandam's group have written 34 publications

Most recent new publication 6/2017

See all their publications

Research, projects and publications in this group

We systematically study tumour and immune/stromal heterogeneity by developing innovative artificial intelligence and machine-learning models to concurrently integrate multi-omics with phenome data.

Cancers are highly heterogeneous at molecular and phenotypic levels that it is essential to stratify these cancer patients for personalised cancer diagnosis and therapy.

To this end, my laboratory’s efforts build on our pioneering molecular stratification in different cancers including colorectal and pancreatic cancers. Nevertheless, we have specific projects in gastroesophageal, breast and pan-cancers (see high impact publications).

We systematically study tumour and immune/stromal heterogeneity by developing innovative artificial intelligence and machine-learning models to concurrently integrate multi-omics with phenome data. Multi-omics data include, but not limited to, image, transcriptome, genome and methylome. Phenome data include clinical outcomes and in vitro/in vivo data such as proliferation, migration, etc.

This careful, systematic approach of integration generates biomarkers and highly probable hypotheses for personalised cancer therapy.

Later, biomarkers are translated to potential molecular assays and tested in the clinic trial/study samples. Similarly, certain hypotheses are validated using mechanism-based pre-clinical cell line and mouse models and experiments.

This approach streamlines solutions to evolving areas in the field of multidisciplinary science including inter/intra-tumoural heterogeneity, companion diagnostic assay development, deconvolution statistical approaches, cell-of-origin/phenotypes-based evolution of tumour, and pre-clinical trials for modelling precision cancer therapy.

Translational cancer research and patient benefit

As a part of the ICR, my interdisciplinary (integrated experimental, computational and clinical biology) laboratory’s research focuses on translational cancer research and patient benefit and leverages national and international clinical trial and tissue resources. Our programme has three overlapping research themes:

1) defining clinically actionable inter/intra-tumoural heterogeneity by systematically integrating multi-omics profiles with phenome data;

2) developing prognostic and/or predictive biomarker-based companion diagnostic assays by dissecting tumour or drug-induced cancer heterogeneity; and

3) identifying and validating subtype-specific drug targets and therapies, specifically those involving immune/stroma pathways, for potential personalised/precision medicine.

Our research is deliberately interdisciplinary to maximise and expedite clinical translation and patient benefit.

Therefore, the existing group, along with clinical collaborators, has three key multidisciplinary components: basic/translational science (pre-clinical and mechanism-based experimental biology; and “Big” data generation); computational biology (development of artificial intelligence and machine learning tools and data analysis); and clinical science (companion diagnostics development; and collaboration-based clinical trial/study-relevant patient samples and data collection).

Our strategic national and international collaborations with industry, large consortia (such as the Colorectal Cancer Subtyping Consortium; CRCSC), leading clinicians across different continents and trial units, bioinformaticians, and biologists support and add value to my laboratory’s activities at the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR).

Furthermore, and focused on patient benefit, we have created an ICR-approved platform to make our companion diagnostic assays (patented already) available internationally for academic research purposes in collaboration.

Finally, we have developed novel bioinformatics and preclinical models, as resources, which are widely and internationally used. Moreover, our lab coordinates multiple cancer research projects related to Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC) specifically related to India.

Our lab is exploring entrepreneurship through various resources for both Sadanandam and group members.

Overall, our groupscience-based research programme aligns well with the ICR/RMH Strategies, the UK’s and international key life sciences strategies, and developing a skilled workforce in interdisciplinary sciences including training clinicians/other disciplinarians in genomic pathology.

Integrated analysis of high-throughput molecular and metabolic profiles to develop pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma subtype-specific therapy

Overall survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) patients is less than 6 months from the time of diagnosis. Currently, patients with advanced or metastatic diseases are treated with gemicitabine, and have only a modest increase in survival. These attributes may reflect the variable and often disappointing responses seen when deploying therapeutic agents in unselected PDAC populations, despite occasional significant responses. Studies in other solid tumours have shown that heterogeneity in therapeutic responses can be anticipated by molecular differences between tumours, and targeting drugs specific to tumour subtypes in which they are predicted to be selectively effective can indeed improve treatment. Seeking to extend this new paradigm, we recently reported three gene expression subtypes of PDA named as classical, quasi-mesenchymal; QM-PDA and exocrine-like PDA using a gene expression signature (62 genes; designated as PDAssigner; Collisson and Sadanandam, et al. Nature Medicine, 2011; co-first author). Interestingly, patients with classical tumours fared better than patients with QM-PDA tumours after resection. We also observed that QM-PDA subtype cell lines are, on average, more sensitive to gemcitabine than the classical subtype lines. The opposite relationship is observed with erlotinib. Along this line, we are interested in characterising the distinct metabolic, genetic and cellular phenotypes of PDA subtypes and their influence on drug responses (precision and personalised medicine) involving wet-lab and bioinformatics by integrating high-throughput molecular and metabolic profiles and correlating the mixed signatures to that of the therapeutic responses.

Characterising colorectal cancer subtypes and integrated analysis of molecular profiles to identify precise therapies

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease that is traditionally classified based on genomic (microsatellite, MSI; or chromosomal instability, CIN) or epigenomic (CpG island methylator phenotype, CIMP) status. In order to achieve a robust and clinically useful means of classification, we performed a novel combination of consensus-based unsupervised clustering of gene expression profiles from patient tumours (n > 1000) to find subtypes within these samples. In total, we identified five integrated CRC subtypes with differential gene expression signatures and prognosis. Namely, we predicted and validated the cellular origin of our subtypes and associated this and the drug responses in order to guide cellular signalling pathway- and mechanism based therapeutic strategies that target subtype-specific tumours. In addition, we also associated our subtypes with (i) MSI status, (ii) Wnt signaling pathway activity, (iii) metastasis to distant organs and (iv) response to targeted and chemotherapy (Sadanandam, et. al., Nature Medicine, 2013). The personalised response of the subtypes to targeted- or chemo-therapy were validated using cell lines in vitro and mouse (xenograft and genetically engineered; cross-species analysis) models in vivo. We will use systems biology approach to extend the characterisation of CRC subtypes in order to facilitate personalised medicine for this devastating disease. In addition, we are interested in understanding cetuximab- and anti-angiogenic therapeutic agents-based adaptive drug resistance in colorectal cancer.

Developing assays using gene signatures that distinguish different subtypes in the clinic

Assigning individual patients to different molecular subtypes require assays that can be used in the clinic. We have developed an exploratory RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry assays that distinguish different subtypes of CRC. Currently, we are interested in further improving these assays and also, developing novel assays involving nCounter platform (Nanostrings Technologies).

Characterising consensus tissue-independent molecular subtypes from different epithelial cancers

We have recently identified subtypes using multiple epithelial type cancers that are independent of tissue specific genes. These subtypes were found to have differential drug responses. We are interested in further characterising these subtypes.

Industrial partnership opportunities with this group

Opportunity: Molecular subtyping and predictive test for personalising colorectal cancer

Commissioner: Professor Anguraj Sadanandam

Recent discoveries from this group

29/04/22

Oral squamous cancer cell (white) being attacked by two cytotoxic T cells (red)

Image: Pseudo-coloured scanning electron micrograph of an oral squamous cancer cell (white) being attacked by two cytotoxic T cells (red), part of a natural immune response. Image from NIH Image Gallery. Licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 2.0 license

Immunotherapy is an exciting type of cancer treatment that harnesses our immune system to recognise and attack cancer cells, which often conceal themselves from the body’s natural defences. It is now being used to treat several cancers, including melanoma and lung cancer – but there is still much untapped potential.

Immunotherapy has been extremely successful for some patients. But the current generation of cancer immunotherapies only work in some cancers, and the mechanisms by which these treatments succeed – or not – still isn’t well understood. We also don't yet have good ways of judging who is most likely to respond, while the overall response rate to immunotherapy is low at around 15 per cent across all cancers.

Combination attack

Now, our researchers are learning much more about the biology of the immune system – and how to turn it against cancer. We are studying the different components of the immune system, including molecules which act as accelerators or brakes on the immune response. The next challenge is to convert this knowledge into a new generation of immunotherapies, or ways of making the current drugs work more effectively.

Our researchers are seeking to uncover strategies which lead to more effective, targeted use of immunotherapy. One key strategy which has emerged through research is to combine immunotherapies with other types of treatment, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, to improve their effectiveness.

For example, immune checkpoint inhibitors are a type of immunotherapy that block key immune-related proteins from binding. They can be combined with radiotherapy to trigger or promote an immune response against tumours, and have seen some clinical success.

Radiotherapy and immunotherapy combinations can also work for cancers that have become resistant to radiotherapy, just as they can be to drugs. This combination attack could make it harder for cancer cells to remain resistant, and lead to more effective treatment.

A study led by Dr Anguraj Sadanandam, who heads our Systems and Precision Cancer Medicine Team, suggested that bowel cancers that have become resistant to radiotherapy might be made susceptible again with targeted immunotherapy. Researchers believe these findings could also be relevant for other cancer types.

Using viruses to kill cancer

Professor Kevin Harrington

Image: Professor Kevin Harrington - Head of the Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging. He studies the use of biologically targeted agents, in combination with treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, to target cancer cells selectively.

We are starting to understand that immunotherapy drugs work best on tumours that have already had some immune response triggered against them. These are known as immunologically ‘hot’ tumours, while ‘cold’ tumours have stimulated little to no pre-existing immunity and generally respond poorly to immunotherapy drugs.

One way to turn cold tumours hot lies in a form of treatment that uses viruses to infect and kill cancer cells. These are known as oncolytic viruses, and they support another avenue of immune exploration – cancer vaccines.

In this approach, oncolytic viruses are used to kill cancer cells and release specific molecules called antigens – boosting an anti-cancer immune response at the same time as turning the tumours ‘hot’. Because of the specificity of this approach, oncolytic virus-induced cancer vaccination is effectively personalised to target a patient’s individual cancer.

Professor Kevin Harrington, Professor of Biological Cancer Therapies at the ICR, and Professor Alan Melcher, who leads our Translational Immunotherapy Team, are exploring how to use these modified oncolytic viruses to kill cancer cells and spark the immune system into action.

Professor Harrington says:

“Early evidence shows that oncolytic viruses could act as effective cancer vaccines against different cancer types, but we still don’t fully know how they work best in patients. We are working to understand the science behind these viruses that will allow us to design and run clinical trials ultimately to make these cancer vaccines a reality.”

Connected radiotherapy network

Radiotherapy machine at The Royal Marsden Hospital (photo: Jan Chlebik/the ICR)

Image: Radiotherapy machine at The Royal Marsden (photo: Jan Chlebik/the ICR)

We are leading efforts to propel progress in immunotherapy research by tackling gaps in research. For example, in-depth investigation is currently lacking when it comes to the biology of the immune response to radiotherapy in patients, treatments and clinical trials – something that is needed to inform and direct future studies into radiotherapy/immunotherapy combinations.

To address these questions, the ICR is leading a new pathology network studying the immune effects of radiotherapy within the Cancer Research UK-funded RadNet – a major radiotherapy hub that connects seven UK centres, including the ICR and The Royal Marsden, to optimise radiotherapy through innovative research.

Find out more about the Radiation Research Centre of Excellence (RadNet) at the ICR and The Royal Marsden.

Learn more about the RadNet centre

The new immune pathology network, named RadPath, sets up the infrastructure to analyse the  immune micro-environment of tumour samples from patients in ongoing trials that include radiotherapy..

A new vision for immunology

Professor Alan Melcher

     Image: Professor Alan Melcher is the Lead of the Centre for Translational Immunotherapy

As research into the immunology of different cancer treatments becomes increasingly active, we are also connecting wider research teams working in this area through our Centre for Translational Immunotherapy (CTI), led by Professor Melcher and The Royal Marsden’s Dr Andrew Furness, and supported by a major donation from the CRIS Cancer Foundation.

The CTI brings together researchers to share their expertise, while inspiring ideas and fostering collaboration. New research is under way across cancer types and disciplines to explore a range of treatment combinations.

This is possible through funding that supports collaborative networks including the CTI, RadNet and our Integrated Pathology Unit, which uses digital pathology to transform how we understand and diagnose cancer.

Professor Melcher says:

“Immunotherapy is extending well beyond where it first started in the treatment of melanoma, as we’re recognising it can help in an increasing number of fields of cancer research. Valuable conversations and collaborations are building around networks such as the CTI, and I’m very excited about the attention they are generating both within the ICR and further afield.”

Making immunotherapy work better, and for more people with cancer, is a vital objective – and one our researchers are determined to meet. With their efforts, we can expect a brighter future for immunotherapy, and for cancer patients.

Our research is already helping patients live longer and live well with cancer. But cancer is clever and can adapt and evolve to evade treatment, so we are looking for new ways to stay one-step-ahead and outsmart cancer. Using treatments in combination is one way of doing this. Please support our research to unlock new combination therapies, so more people will survive cancer.

Let’s finish cancer, together.

Donate today