Professor Kevin Harrington
Head of Division: Targeted Therapy, Magnetic Resonance
Biography
Professor Kevin Harrington studied medicine at St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, and began focusing on head and neck cancer while a PhD student at Hammersmith Hospital. His PhD thesis was on the subject of liposomally-targeted radiosensitisers in head and neck cancer, including both pre-clinical and translational clinical studies.
See all news stories on our website that feature the work of Professor Harrington and colleagues.
He completed postdoctoral research in Professor Richard Vile’s laboratory at the Molecular Medicine Programme in the Mayo Clinic, Minnesota, with a specific focus on gene therapy and viral gene delivery. He joined the ICR in 2001 as Group Leader in Targeted Therapy within the Section of Cell and Molecular Biology under the leadership of Professor Chris Marshall. He was appointed as Non-Time-Limited (Tenured) Faculty in 2008, Reader in 2010 and Professor in 2012.
Professor Harrington specialises in developing new treatments using biologically-targeted agents (such as viruses, antibodies and small molecules) that selectively destroy cancer cells and activate anti-tumour immune responses. He is Professor of Biological Cancer Therapies at The Institute of Cancer Research and an honorary consultant oncologist at the Royal Marsden (RMH) and St George’s Hospital.
Professor Harrington was appointed as Head of the ICR’s Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging in 2013. He is a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator (elected in 2016) and leads the Targeted Physical Therapies theme within the RMH/ICR Biomedical Research Centre.
Professor Harrington is the national chair of the CRUK Advanced Radiotherapy Technologies Network Accelerator (ART-NET) and has held a CRUK programme grant for research in head and neck cancer since 2011. He is Director of the CRUK/Wellcome Clinical Research PhD studentship programme at ICR and co-chairs the Research Sub-Committee of the ICR/Imperial College CRUK Major Centre.
Professor Harrington’s laboratory research group focuses on a number of themes at the interface between biologically-targeted agents and standard-of-care therapies, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In the clinic, he leads research in oncolytic virotherapies, targeted small molecule inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors and small molecule activators of innate immune responses.
Professor Harrington is a member of the Cancer Research UK Convergence Science Centre, which brings together leading researchers in engineering, physical sciences, life sciences and medicine to develop innovative ways to address challenges in cancer.
BSc (Hons) MBBS MRCP FRCR FRCP PhD DIC.
FRSB, Royal Society of Biology.
Rohan Williams Medal, Royal College of Radiologists, 1994.
Frank Ellis Medal, Royal College of Radiologists, 2002.
British Association of Head and Neck Oncology President's Prize for Research, British Association of Head and Neck Oncology, 2019.
NIHR Senior Investigator Award, NIHR, 2016.
Honorary Membership Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology, Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2017.
Alon J Dembo Visiting Professorship, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, 2014.
Editorial BoardsFrontiers in Oncology, 2016.
European Journal of Cancer, 2012-2014.
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2017.
Journal of Immunotherapy of Cancer, 2019.
Head and Neck Cancer Clinical Studies Group, Member, NCRI, 2006-2014.
Discovery Committee, Member, CRUK, 2008-2014.
Clinical and Translational Radiotherapy Research Working Group, Executive Group Member, NCRI, 2009-2015.
CTRad, Phase I/II Clinical Trials Group (Workstream 2), Co-Chair, NCRI, 2009-2012.
CTRad, Pre-clinical Studies Group (Workstream 1), Co-Chair, NCRI, 2012-2015.
Clinical Committee, Member, ESTRO, 2013-2015.
Radiation and Drug Combination Consortium (RadCom), Member, NCRI, 2014.
Clinical Research Committee, Member, CRUK, 2014-2017.
Biological Therapies Expert Review Panel, Member, CRUK, 2014-2017.
Global Executive Steering Committee, Member, MR Linac Global Consortium, 2015-2019.
ART-NET Network Accelerator Award, Chair, CRUK, 2016.
Related pages
Types of Publications
Journal articles
Systemic administration of currently manufactured viral stocks has not so far achieved sufficient circulating titers to allow therapeutic targeting of metastatic disease. This is due to low initial viral titers, immune inactivation, nonspecific adhesion, and loss of particles. One way to exploit the elegant molecular manipulations that have been made to increase vector targeting is to protect these vectors until they reach the local sites of tumor growth. Various cell types home preferentially to tumors and can be loaded with the constructs required to produce targeted vectors. Here we discuss the potential of using such cell carriers to chaperone precious vectors directly to the tumors. The vectors can incorporate mechanisms to achieve tumor site-inducible expression, along with tumor cell-specific expression of the therapeutic gene and/or replicating viral genomes that would be released at the tumor. In this way, the great advances that have so far been made with the engineering of vector tropisms might be genuinely exploited and converted into clinical benefit.
Syk, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase, is an important component of immunoreceptor signaling in hematopoietic cells. It has been implicated in key regulatory pathways including phosphoinositide 3-kinase and phospholipase Cgamma (PLCgamma) activation in B cells and integrin signaling in platelets and bronchial epithelial cells. Recently, potential roles in cancer have been reported. In breast cancers, reduced Syk expression was associated with invasion, and its overexpression in cell lines was shown to inhibit cell motility. In contrast, Syk has been shown to mediate chemomigration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Its role in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) has not yet been investigated. Syk mRNA and protein expression was detected in 6 of 10 SCCHN cell lines. When Syk was transfected into Syk-negative cells (SIHN-011A), chemomigration was enhanced in vitro and this was associated with activation of PLCgamma1. Conversely, abrogation of Syk activity by pharmacologic inhibition or small interfering RNA in HN6 cells with high levels of endogenous expression inhibited migration, haptotaxis, and engagement with matrix proteins; this was accompanied by decreased levels of phosphorylated AKT. Similar effects were seen in Syk-positive CAL 27 cells but not in Syk-negative SIHN-011A cells. Immunoprecipitation suggested co-association of Syk with epidermal growth factor receptor and GRB-2. Syk expression in SCCHN patient tissues was examined by semiquantitative real-time PCR (n = 45) and immunohistochemistry (n = 38) in two independent cohorts. Higher levels of Syk expression were observed in tumors and lymph node metastases relative to normal tissues. High Syk expression significantly correlated with worse survival and may be of prognostic value in SCCHN due to its potential role in cell migration and invasion.
BACKGROUND: Retroviral vectors are suitable for targeting endothelial cells in the tumour neovasculature because of their intrinsic selectivity for proliferating cells. Previously, we inserted regulatory elements of the endothelial-specific prepro-endothelin-1 (ppET1) promoter in retroviral vectors to generate high-titre, replication-defective recombinant retroviruses that restricted gene expression to the vascular compartment of tumours. METHODS: A retroviral vector was generated in which expression of herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) was transcriptionally restricted to endothelial cells, under the control of a hybrid ppET-1 LTR. Xenograft tumour models were used to determine the efficacy of targeting HSV-TK to the tumour vasculature. Subsequently, vascular-targeted gene therapy was combined with chemotherapeutic agents. RESULTS: Breast or colorectal xenograft tumour growth was reduced and survival was increased in response to ganciclovir treatment. Treatment resulted in widespread vascular disruption and tumour cell apoptosis. In colorectal tumours, combination with irinotecan, a cytotoxic drug used to treat colorectal cancer, significantly increased survival compared to drug alone. No beneficial effect on survival was observed when combined with cisplatin, a cytotoxic drug not in clinical use for this tumour type. On the basis of their relative efficacies in vitro against tumour and endothelial cells, co-operativity with irinotecan likely derives from additionally targeting the peripheral tumour cells that survive the anti-vascular treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We show that the ppET1-targeted vector is efficacious for therapeutic gene expression in vivo, validating a strategy targeted to tumour vasculature, and demonstrate that vascular targeting combined with appropriate chemotherapy is more effective than either therapy alone.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) tends to run an aggressive course and the prognosis has remained virtually unchanged in recent decades. The development of novel therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcome centres on the biology of the disease, namely the pivotal c-erbB family of growth factor receptors. c-erbB1 (or epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR), is key to the pathogenesis of SCCHN and plays a central role in a complex network of downstream integrated signalling pathways. EGFR overexpression, detected in up to 90% of SCCHN, correlates with an increased risk of locoregional tumour relapse following primary therapy and relative resistance to treatment. The biological sequelae of erbB receptor activation are not simply cell proliferation, but also inhibition of apoptosis, enhanced migration, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis: the 'hallmarks of cancer' [1]. As EGFR overexpression is associated with a poor clinical outcome in SCCHN, this receptor is attractive as a therapeutic target and the successful development of targeted therapies represents a paradigm shift in the medical approach to head and neck cancer. However, the extensive cross talk between signalling pathways, the multiple molecular aberrations and genetic plasticity in SCCHN all contribute to inherent and acquired resistance to both conventional and novel therapies. Understanding the cancer cell biology, in particular the significance of co-expression of c-erbB (and other) receptors, and the cell survival stimuli from (for example) activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3-kinase) cascade is fundamental to overcome current limitations in biologically targeted therapies.
Dramatic responses to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors may be seen in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with a sensitizing mutation of the EGFR TK domain. It is not known how to predict response in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), where EGFR TK mutations are less frequent and where response rates in unselected patients are disappointing. We have characterized the intrinsic sensitivity of a panel of 18 SCCHN cell lines to gefitinib, an EGFR TK inhibitor, and have investigated correlations between putative markers of response and intrinsic sensitivity. Induction of G1 arrest was only seen in cell lines with GI(50) < 1 microM. Expression of EGFR, by three techniques, correlated with sensitivity to gefitinib. ERB-B2 expression appeared to influence sensitivity to gefitinib but ERB-B3 expression did not. While EGFR tyrosine kinase mutations were not detected, EGFR gene amplification was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the most sensitive cell line. The number of cytosine adenine dinucleotide repeats in intron 1 of the EGFR gene did not correlate with sensitivity. E-cadherin expression was detected in cell lines with a range of sensitivities, whereas amphiregulin was secreted predominantly by sensitive cell lines. MET expression was an independent predictor of sensitivity to gefitinib, although neither expression nor phosphorylation of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor correlated with intrinsic resistance. Breast receptor kinase (BRK) was more highly expressed in the sensitive cell lines, but siRNA knockdown of neither BRK nor MET affected sensitivity. Our data suggest that overexpression of EGFR and multiple related cell surface receptors may be associated with sensitivity to gefitinib and that differences between our data and the literature highlight that biomarkers of response are tumour type- and cell line-dependent.
The last few years have seen a significant increase in our understanding of the molecular pathways governing cell function in cancer. This has led to an explosive interest in novel molecularly-targeted agents and, until recently, the focus of research effort has been to combine these agents with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, following a recent trial of an anti-EGFR targeted antibody in combination with radiation, a new paradigm is emerging in which these novel agents will be combined with external beam radiotherapy (RT). In this article we review classes of novel targeted radiosensitisers that are directed at specific aspects of cell function. Such agents are aimed at either single or multiple targets (the latter is a more attractive approach in view of cross-talk between different cell signaling pathways). We review available preclinical and clinical literature with a particular focus on novel agents targeting components of the ErbB and IGF-1R family cell signaling pathways. In this model, radiosensitisers can exert their effects at the cell membrane surface by preventing receptor activation or by interfering with the function of second messengers such as the Ras/PI3K/mTOR pathway. In addition, the effects of novel DNA repair inhibitors will be considered in the context of combination strategies with signal transduction pathway blockade. Other small molecule inhibitors, such as HSP90 inhibitors, that can disrupt signaling in a number of different pathways, will also be discussed. Ultimately, through the synergistic use of these innovative molecules and RT, the therapeutic index may be enhanced by modulating cellular metabolism, proliferation, repair, angiogenesis, and apoptosis. The rapid proliferation of available targeted agents and their entry into phase I clinical trials means that this is an extremely interesting area for research in radiation oncology.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) allows the delivery of higher and more homogeneous radiation dose to head and neck tumours. This study aims to determine the safety of dose-escalated chemo-IMRT for larynx preservation in locally advanced head and neck cancer. METHODS: Patients with T2-4, N1-3, M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx or hypopharynx were treated with a simultaneous-boost IMRT. Two radiation dose levels (DL) were tested: In DL 1, 63 Gy/28F was delivered to primary tumour and involved nodes and 51.8 Gy/28F to elective nodes. In DL 2, the doses were 67.2 Gy/28F and 56 Gy/28F, respectively, representing a 9% dose escalation for the primary. All patients received 2 cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, and concomitant cisplatin. Acute (NCICTCv.2.0) and late toxicity (RTOG and modified LENTSOM) were collected. RESULTS: Thirty patients were entered, 15 in each dose level. All patients completed the treatment schedule. In DL 1, the incidences of acute G3 toxicities were 27% (pain), 20% (radiation dermatitis), 0% (xerostomia) and 67% required gastrostomy tubes. For DL 2 the corresponding incidences were 40%, 20%, 7%, and 87%. G3 dysphagia and pain persisted longer in DL 2. With regard to mucositis, a prolonged healing time for DL 2 was found, with prevalence of G2 of 58% in week 10. No acute grade 4 toxicity was observed. At 6 months, 1 patient in DL 2 had G3 late toxicity (dysphagia). No dose limiting toxicity was found. Complete response rates were 80% in DL 1, and 87% in DL 2. CONCLUSION: Moderately accelerated chemo-IMRT is safe and feasible with good compliance and acceptable acute toxicity. Dose escalation was possible without a significant difference in acute toxicity. Longer follow-up is required to determine the incidence of late radiation toxicities, and tumour control rates.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This phase 1 study was designed to determine the toxicity of accelerated fractionation IMRT in locally advanced thyroid cancer. METHODS: Patients with high risk locally advanced thyroid cancer who required post-operative EBRT were recruited. A single-phase inverse-planned-simultaneous-boost was delivered by IMRT: 58.8 Gy/28F (daily) to the primary tumour and involved nodes and 50 Gy/28F to the elective nodes. Acute (NCICTCv.2.0) and late toxicity (RTOG and modified LENTSOM) was collected. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were treated (7 medullary thyroid, 2 Hurthle cell and 4 well differentiated thyroid cancer). G3 and G2 radiation dermatitis rates were 38.5% and 31%; G3 and G2 mucositis rates 8% and 53% and G3 and G2 pain 23% and 54%. Thirty-one percentage required enteral feeding. G3 and G2 xerostomia rates were 0% and 31%. Recovery was seen, with 62% patients having dysphagia G< or =1 2 months after IMRT. Thirty percent of patients developed L'Hermitte's syndrome. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. No dose limiting toxicity was found. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated fractionation IMRT in this group of patients is feasible and safe. The acute toxicity appeared acceptable and early indicators of late toxicity moderate and similar to what would be expected with conventional RT. Longer follow up is required to quantify late side effects.
PURPOSE: To test combination treatment schedules of reovirus and radiation in human and murine tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In vitro cytotoxicity and cell cycle effects of reovirus given alone and combined with radiotherapy were assessed by colorimetric, tissue culture infectious dose 50, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based assays. Interactions between the agents were evaluated using combination index analysis. The effect of different schedules of reovirus and radiotherapy on viral replication and cytotoxicity was tested in vitro and the combination was assessed in three tumor models in vivo. RESULTS: Characterization of reovirus cytotoxicity in a panel of cell lines yielded a range of sensitivities. Combined reovirus and radiotherapy yielded statistically significantly increased cytotoxicity, particularly in cell lines with moderate susceptibility to reovirus alone. The enhanced cytotoxicity of the combination occurred independently of treatment sequence or schedule. Radiation did not affect viral replication and only reduced reoviral cytotoxicity after clinically irrelevant single doses (>50 Gy). Combination index analysis revealed synergy between radiation (3-10 Gy) and reovirus at multiplicities of infection between 0.001 and 1. Combination treatment significantly increased apoptosis in tumor cells relative to either single-agent treatment. In vivo studies using xenograft and syngeneic tumors showed enhanced activity of the combination relative to reovirus or radiation alone (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Combining reovirus and radiotherapy synergistically enhances cytotoxicity in a variety of tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. These results offer strong support for translational clinical trials of reovirus plus radiotherapy that have been initiated in the clinic.
There is an emerging realization from animal models that the immune response may have both detrimental and beneficial therapeutic effects during cancer virotherapy. However, there is a dearth of clinical data on the immune response to viral agents in patients. During a recently completed phase I trial of intravenous reovirus type 3 Dearing (RT3D), heavily pretreated patients with advanced cancers received RT3D at doses escalating from 1 x 10(8) tissue culture infectious dose-50 (TCID(50)) on day 1 to 3 x 10(10) TCID(50) on 5 consecutive days of a 4 weekly cycle. A detailed analysis of the immune effects was conducted by collecting serial clinical samples for analysis of neutralizing anti-reoviral antibodies (NARA), peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and cytokines. Significant increases in NARA were seen with peak endpoint titres >1/10 000 in all but one patient. The median fold increase was 250, with a range of 9-6437. PBMC subset analysis showed marked heterogeneity. At baseline, CD3+CD4+ T cells were reduced in most patients, but after RT3D therapy their numbers increased in 47.6% of patients. In contrast, most patients had high baseline CD3+CD8+ T-cell levels, with 33% showing incremental increases after therapy. In some patients, there was increased cytotoxic T-cell activation post-therapy, as shown by increased CD8+perforin/granzyme+ T-cell numbers. Most patients had high numbers of circulating CD3-CD56+ NK cells before therapy and in 28.6% this increased with treatment. Regulatory (CD3+CD4+CD25+) T cells were largely unaffected by the therapy. Combined Th1 and Th2 cytokine expression increased in 38% of patients. These data confirm that even heavily pretreated patients are capable of mounting dynamic immune responses during treatment with RT3D, although these responses are not clearly related to the administered virus dose. These data will provide the basis for future studies aiming to modulate the immune response during virotherapy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) at the Royal Marsden Hospital London was introduced in July 2001. Treatment delivery was dynamic using a single-phase technique. Concerns were raised regarding increased clinical workload due to introduction of new technology. The potential increased use of resources was assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IMRT patient selection was within guidelines of clinical trials and included patients undergoing prostate plus pelvic lymph node (PPN) irradiation and head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. Patient planning, quality assurance and treatment times were collected for an initial IMRT patient group. A comparative group of patients with advanced HNC undergoing two- or three-phase conventional radiotherapy, requiring matched photon and electron fields, were also timed. RESULTS: The median overall total planning time for IMRT was greater for HNC patients compared to the PPN cohort. For HNC the overall IMRT planning time was significantly longer than for conventional. The median treatment time for conventional two- or three-phase HNC treatments, encompassing similar volumes to those treated with IMRT, was greater than that for the IMRT HNC patient cohort. A reduction in radiographer man hours per patient of 4.8h was recorded whereas physics time was increased by 4.9h per patient. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT currently increases overall planning time. Additional clinician input is required for target volume localisation. Physics time is increased, a significant component of this being patient specific QA. Radiographer time is decreased. For HNC a single phase IMRT treatment has proven to be more efficient than a multiple phase conventional treatment. IMRT has been integrated smoothly and efficiently into the existing treatment working day. This preliminary study suggests that IMRT could be a routine treatment with efficient use of current radiotherapy resources.
PURPOSE: To assess target coverage and dose homogeneity using conventional radiotherapy (RT) and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) with anterior and posterior beams for elective irradiation of the cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A planning study was performed in six patients who had undergone radical RT for head and neck cancer. RT plans to irradiate the cervical lymph nodes using a single anterior field, or opposed anterior and posterior fields, with 6 or 10 MV photons were compared. Plans using IMRT for missing-tissue compensation were also studied. An algorithm was developed to guide clinicians to the most appropriate treatment technique depending on the nodal groups to be irradiated. RESULTS: With 6 MV single field (SF) irradiation significant under-dose (minimum dose <70% of prescription dose) was seen in nodal groups II and V, due to their posterior position. With SF 10 MV the mean dose to level II was higher (p<0.001) and dose homogeneity to levels Ib and II was improved. Using opposed fields (OF), minimum doses to the nodes in levels II and V were improved. OF using 10 MV showed significant advantage over 6 MV with reduction of maximum doses to levels II, III and V. SF 10 MV IMRT improved maximum doses to levels Ib and II compared to SF 6 MV IMRT. OF IMRT gave the best dose distributions with optimal mean dose and dose homogeneity. Beam energy made no difference with OF IMRT. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal technique for elective cervical node irradiation depends on the lymph node levels within the PTV. If irradiation of the level II or V nodes is required, then the OF IMRT technique with either 6 or 10 MV gives the best dose distributions. In the absence of IMRT, then OF conventional techniques are best. If the aim is to irradiate levels III and IV or level IV only, then 6 MV SF non-IMRT is the simplest technique.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the most common cause of cancer-related death in the developed world. Despite advances in therapy with conventional modalities, over 85% of patients will die from their disease within 5 years of diagnosis. For patients with inoperable lung cancer, the addition of chemotherapy to radical radiotherapy yields a small but significant 10% survival benefit at 3 years. However, the systemic toxicity of chemotherapy is common and may be severe. Over the past 20 years, dramatic improvements in our understanding of the molecular etiology of cancer have enabled the development of novel targeted therapies. Overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in lung cancer correlates with an aggressive disease course and poor tumor response to radiotherapy. Strategies to inhibit this molecular switch have become a focus for drug development. Preclinical efficacy has been repeatedly demonstrated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and responses have been documented in the clinic with acceptable toxicity. Phase III trials combining EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors with radical chemoradiation are recruiting at present. This review addresses the current challenges of discovering how best to use these new anticancer therapies, with particular emphasis on the enhancement of existing therapeutic strategies such as radical radiotherapy, factors relating to patient selection and prediction of clinical response.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite significant surgical advances and refinement in the delivery of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, prognosis has improved little in recent decades. Better local control has led to the late presentation of distant metastases and novel therapeutic agents are urgently required to prevent relapse, control disseminated disease and thus improve survival. PIK3CA encodes the p110alpha isoform of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3-K) and is important in SCCHN, aberrations in its activity occurring early in the oncogenic process. PI3-K signalling promotes cell survival, proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis, all contributing to tumour progression. Activation of the PI3-K pathway may also mediate resistance to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and novel therapeutic agents such as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Elements of this signalling matrix, therefore, offer attractive therapeutic targets in SCCHN as inhibition of many malignant characteristics, as well as sensitisation to multiple treatment modalities, could be anticipated.
PURPOSE: To investigate the potential for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to spare the bowel in rectal tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The targets (pelvic nodal and rectal volumes), bowel, and bladder were outlined in 5 patients. All had conventional, three-dimensional conformal RT and forward-planned multisegment three-field IMRT plans compared with inverse-planned simultaneous integrated boost nine-field equally spaced IMRT plans. Equally spaced seven-field and five-field and five-field, customized, segmented IMRT plans were also evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of the prescribed dose covered at least 95% of both planning target volumes using all but the conventional plan (mean primary and pelvic planning target volume receiving 95% of the prescribed dose was 32.8 +/- 13.7 Gy and 23.7 +/- 4.87 Gy, respectively), reflecting a significant lack of coverage. The three-field forward planned IMRT plans reduced the volume of bowel irradiated to 45 Gy and 50 Gy by 26% +/- 16% and 42% +/- 27% compared with three-dimensional conformal RT. Additional reductions to 69 +/- 51 cm(3) to 45 Gy and 20 +/- 21 cm(3) to 50 Gy were obtained with the nine-field equally spaced IMRT plans-64% +/- 11% and 64% +/- 20% reductions compared with three-dimensional conformal RT. Reducing the number of beams and customizing the angles for the five-field equally spaced IMRT plan did not significantly reduce bowel sparing. CONCLUSION: The bowel volume irradiated to 45 Gy and 50 Gy was significantly reduced with IMRT, which could potentially lead to less bowel toxicity. Reducing the number of beams did not reduce bowel sparing and the five-field customized segmented IMRT plan is a reasonable technique to be tested in clinical trials.
AIMS: There is considerable controversy surrounding target volume definition for parotid-sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric and radiobiological predictors of outcome anticipated by application of the detailed target volume definition guidelines agreed for the UK multicentre randomised controlled trial of parotid-sparing IMRT (PARSPORT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients eligible for the study were delineated using the trial guidelines. Following the protocol, plans were produced to treat these volumes with three-dimensional radiotherapy (control arm) and IMRT aimed to spare dose to the contralateral parotid gland (experimental arm). Dosimetric comparisons were made between plans, and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modelling for salivary glands was carried out. RESULTS: Doses delivered to the planning target volumes (PTV) were similar with each technique, although IMRT produced more homogeneous irradiation of the PTV. Mean doses to the contralateral parotid gland were 22.4+/-1.7 Gy with the IMRT plans vs 60.0+/-7.2 Gy with three-dimensional radiotherapy, P=0.0003. Calculated contralateral parotid gland NTCP values for grade 2 xerostomia were 20-22% for IMRT and 98-100% for three-dimensional radiotherapy (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Pre-clinical evaluation of the PARSPORT trial target volume definition guidelines provides theoretical support for a significant reduction in xerostomia rates. These data await confirmation from the clinical trial results.
After radiotherapy for pelvic cancer, chronic gastrointestinal problems may affect quality of life (QOL) in 6-78% of patients. This variation may be due to true differences in outcome in different diseases, and may also represent the inadequacy of the scales used to measure radiotherapy-induced gastrointestinal side effects. The aim of this study was to assess whether outcome measures used for nonmalignant gastrointestinal disease are useful to detect gastrointestinal morbidity after radiotherapy. Results obtained from a Vaizey Incontinence questionnaire and a modified Inflammatory Bowel Disease questionnaire (IBDQ)--both patient completed--were compared to those from a staff administered Late Effects on Normal Tissue (LENT)--Subjective, Objective, Management and Analytic (SOMA) questionnaire in patients who had completed radiotherapy for a pelvic tumour at least 3 months previously. In all, 142 consecutive patients were recruited, 72 male and 70 female, median age 66 years (range 26-90 years), a median of 27 (range 3-258) months after radiotherapy. In total, 62 had been treated for a gynaecological, 58, a urological and 22, a gastrointestinal tract tumour. Of these, 21 had undergone previous gastrointestinal surgery and seven suffered chronic gastrointestinal disorders preceding their diagnosis of cancer. The Vaizey questionnaire suggested that 27% patients were incontinent for solid stools, 35% for liquid stools and 37% could not defer defaecation for 15 min. The IBDQ suggested that 89% had developed a chronic change in bowel habit and this change significantly affected 49% patients: 44% had more frequent or looser bowel movements, 30% were troubled by abdominal pain, 30% were troubled by bloating, 28% complained of tenesmus, 27% were troubled by their accidental soiling and 20% had rectal bleeding. At least 34% suffered emotional distress and 22% impairment of social function because of their bowels. The small intestine/colon SOMA median score was 0.1538 (range 0-1) and the rectal SOMA median score was 0.1428 (range 0-1). Pearson's correlations for the IBDQ score and small intestine/colon SOMA score was -0.630 (P<0.001), IBDQ and rectum SOMA -0.616 (P<0.001), IBDQ and Vaizey scores -0.599 (P<0.001), Vaizey and small intestine/colon SOMA 0.452 (P<0.001) and Vaizey and rectum SOMA 0.760 (P<0.001). After radiotherapy for a tumour in the pelvis, half of all patients develop gastrointestinal morbidity, which affects their QOL. A modified IBDQ and Vaizey questionnaire are reliable in assessing new gastrointestinal symptoms as well as overall QOL and are much easier to use than LENT SOMA.