Preclinical Molecular Imaging Group

Dr Gabriela Kramer-Marek’s group uses cutting-edge biomedical imaging techniques to gain information about the way particular genes drive cancer progression.

Our group’s long-term goal is to develop specific biomarkers for detecting cancers and to evaluate these biomarkers in pre-clinical cancer models

Notwithstanding the remarkable clinical success of mAb-based treatment regimens, not all patients benefit from them. This can be attributed, at least in part, to the complexity of the tumour microenvironment and its considerable heterogeneity both in terms of the tumour and non-tumour cell components. These phenomena represent a huge challenge in identifying predictive biomarkers and stratifying patient populations for personalised therapy approaches.

Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop assays that will help in three ways:

  1. accurate patient selection
  2. understanding intrinsic resistance mechanisms or the emergence of acquired resistance following treatment initiation and
  3. choosing the most effective combination regimen in circumstances in which single-agent therapies are insufficiently effective.

Currently, the baseline expression level of antigens targeted by therapeutic mAbs can be analysed by methods such as: immunohistochemistry (IHC), flow cytometry, proteomics, or next-generation sequencing of tumour tissues acquired at diagnostic biopsy or intra-operatively. These techniques aid our understanding of how cancer cells adapt to treatment and become resistant, but such methods are inherently invasive, prone to sampling errors caused by inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity of receptor expression within analysed biopsy specimens and do not lend themselves readily to repeated sampling.

Positron emission tomography (PET), using radiolabelled mAbs, antibody fragments or engineered protein scaffolds (immuno-PET), has the potential to acquire information non-invasively and can be highly complementary to analyses based on tissue acquisition. Accordingly, immuno-PET agents might accurately identify the presence and accessibility of the target and provide a rapid assessment of tumour response to a variety of treatments in a timely fashion (e.g. within 1-2 weeks of treatment initiation).

Furthermore, immuno-PET agents can provide information about the heterogeneity of both target expression and therapeutic response, which are increasingly recognised as key factors in treatment resistance. This especially relates to patients with advanced disease in whom target expression may vary from site to site and a biopsy of a single local or metastatic deposit may not accurately reflect the situation across the entire disease burden. Although introduction of immuno-PET into routine clinical practice may add complexity and increase costs, with appropriate use this imaging modality has the potential to identify patients likely to benefit from therapy and assess the efficacy of novel target-specific drugs.

Against this background, our research focuses on the development and characterisation of targeted-PET radiotracers, including protein-based theranostic agents that enable smart monitoring of immunotherapies and expand opportunities for personalised medicine approaches.

Early diagnosis and individualized therapy have been recognized as crucial for the improvement of cancer treatment outcome. While proper molecular characterization of individual tumour types facilitates choice of the right therapeutic strategies, early assessment of tumour response to therapy could allow the physicians to discontinue ineffective treatment and offer the patient a more promising alternative. Therefore, the role of molecular imaging in elucidating molecular pathways involved in cancer progression and the ability to select the most effective therapy based on the unique biologic characteristics of the patient and the molecular properties of a tumour are undoubtedly of paramount importance.

The mission of this group is to investigate innovative imaging probes and apply them to novel orthotopic or metastatic models that are target driven, to gain information of the way particular oncogenes drive cancer progression through signalling pathways that can be imaged in vivo and, correlate it with target level ex vivo. Such an approach enables non-invasive assessment of biochemical target levels, target modulation and provides opportunities to optimize the drug dosing for maximum therapeutic effect, which leads to the development of better strategies for the more precise delivery of medicine.

The long term goal of our research is to develop specific imaging cancer biomarkers, especially for positron emission tomography (PET) as well as optical imaging and, evaluate these biomarkers in pre-clinical cancer models. Significant efforts are directed towards validating biomarkers for early prediction of treatment response, with the focus on new targeted therapies (such as inhibition of cell signalling pathways).

Our initial portfolio of imaging agents include radiolabelled affibody molecules, TK inhibitors and, conventional tracers that monitor universal markers of tumour physiology.

We are actively supported by other groups from the Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging as well as the Division of Cancer Therapeutics. Moreover, our close association with The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust enables rapid translation of our research to early clinical studies and ensures a fast transition of know-how from the research laboratory to the patient bedside.

Dr Gabriela Kramer-Marek

Group Leader:

Preclinical Molecular Imaging Gabriela Kramer-Marek

Dr Gabriela Kramer-Marek is investigating new ways of molecular imaging in order to predict an individual patient’s response to treatment. Before moving to the ICR, she developed a new approach for non-invasive assessment of HER2 expression in breast cancer.

Researchers in this group

.

Phone: 020 3437 6376

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

.

Phone: +44 20 3437 6785

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

.

Phone: +44 20 3437 6857

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

.

Phone: 020 3437 4549

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

Dr Gabriela Kramer-Marek's group have written 63 publications

Most recent new publication 10/2024

See all their publications

Recent discoveries from this group

30/01/25

A new study has provided novel insights into the effects of radiation on the immune cells surrounding breast cancer tumours. The findings show that the relationship between these cells, known as the tumour-immune microenvironment (TIME), and radiation is more complex than previously believed. This means further work is necessary to determine how best to use radiotherapy to maximise the benefits of other treatments, such as immunotherapy.

For the first time, the researchers assessed this relationship in the pre-operative setting with doses that are routinely used in the post-operative setting. Here, the tumour is still in place in the body, so the effects of radiotherapy on the TIME surrounding it can be determined more clearly.

The study findings are likely to have important clinical implications, particularly in relation to the design of future radiotherapy clinical trials. In the longer-term, the team believes that this work could lead to more successful combination therapies involving radiotherapy and immunotherapy, which could improve outcomes in high-risk breast cancer patients.

The study was led by scientists at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, and published in the journal International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. The work was funded by The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), which is both a research institute and a charity.

Using neoadjuvant radiotherapy to boost treatment

There is increasing interest in the potential of radiotherapy to prime a patient’s body for treatment by making their cancer more receptive to immunotherapy – a type of treatment that recruits the body’s immune system to fight the disease.

Other research has suggested that radiotherapy may be able to switch so-called ‘cold’ tumours, which are resistant to immunotherapy and must be treated with traditional therapies such as chemotherapy, to ‘hot’ tumours.

Scientists can distinguish between the two types by looking for cancer-fighting white blood cells, or lymphocytes, called T-cells. ‘Hot’ tumours have been infiltrated by T-cells, which is a sign that the immune system has recognised the cancerous cells and is working to destroy them. Scientists refer to these cells as tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and use them as a marker of survival in several types of cancer.

There is evidence to suggest that radiotherapy can increase the number of TILs in tumours. As a result, it is widely believed that neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NART), which is delivered before surgery with the tumour still present, could increase the likelihood of a positive outcome using immunotherapy.

However, some preclinical studies have found that radiotherapy may in fact suppress the body’s immune response, which would make immunotherapy less effective. The researchers behind the current study aimed to solve this conundrum.

Harnessing data from clinical trials

Previous research has been limited by the current standard of care in breast cancer, whereby radiotherapy is routinely delivered to a patient following surgery to remove their tumour. This approach has meant that researchers have only been able to study the effects of irradiating the cancerous cells in a laboratory setting, where the TIME cannot be considered.

For this study, the research team used patient samples from two UK-based clinical trials investigating NART in people with breast cancer. The first trial, Primary Radiotherapy And DIEP flAp Reconstruction Trial (PRADA), was led by The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and partially funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research’s (NIHR’s) Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden and the ICR. The charity Breast Cancer Now, which also funds the Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre at the ICR, funded the second clinical trial, Neo-RT, which was led by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

These trials provided the researchers with blood and tumour samples from a total of 43 people with non-metastatic breast cancer of various subtypes. The samples were taken at multiple timepoints throughout the trials, allowing the researchers to detect any differences between the pre-, during, and post-radiotherapy samples.

NART may significantly deplete white blood cells

The researchers began by allocating scores to the patient samples based on the number of TILs located in certain regions of the tissue. They noted that higher scores correlated with specific breast cancer subtypes, with people with HER2-positive or triple negative breast cancer more likely to have increased lymphocyte infiltration. People with higher grades of breast cancer also typically had higher scores.

When they looked at changes to these scores over time, the researchers noted that NART seemed to contribute to the sustained loss of TILs from both the TIME in the breast and the peripheral bloodstream. Importantly, the levels of these cells did not recover by the time of surgery.

The study authors draw particular attention to the routine delivery of radiotherapy to the regional lymph nodes in people with breast cancer, which is done to prevent the disease from spreading further. They note that this strategy may be impairing immune activity and suggest that “preserving the lymph nodes may prove crucial for the effective combination and sequencing of radiotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade [a form of immunotherapy] prior to surgery.”

“A unique opportunity”

Joint senior author Dr Navita Somaiah, Group Leader of the Translational Breast Radiobiology Group at the ICR and Honorary Consultant Clinical Oncologist in the Breast Unit at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, said:

“Our study represents a major advance in our understanding of the dynamics of TILs in response to radiotherapy in breast cancer. Despite the explosion of interest in the immunogenic potential of radiotherapy, a huge gap has persisted in our knowledge about the effect of radiation alone on the breast TIME.

“This work has started to close that gap, but it also highlights the need for deeper interrogation of factors such as dose fractionation, the timing of radiotherapy and volumes irradiated so that we can optimise radiation-induced immunogenic cell death.”

Joint first author Miki Yoneyama, a PhD student in the Translational Breast Radiobiology Group at the ICR, said:

“The recent trials testing the safety of NART in breast cancer gave us a unique opportunity to test the effects of radiotherapy in vivo. Our dataset represents a unique insight into the relationship between radiation and TIME, and it brings into question the widely held belief that radiotherapy converts immunologically ‘cold’ tumours into ‘hot’ tumours.  

“Our findings will likely contribute to the ongoing debate about the merits of lymph node irradiation for patients receiving immunotherapies. We hope that further exploration of this complex area of radiobiology will ultimately lead to improved outcomes for everyone living with breast cancer.”

Image: Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, a key type of immune cell, can be identified within the breast tumour microenvironment (left panel). Additional techniques allow researchers to study these in more detail, as shown in the right panel (white marks breast cancer cells, with other colours marking different types of lymphocytes). Credit: Somaiah N, et al. (2024).