Preclinical Molecular Imaging Group

Dr Gabriela Kramer-Marek’s group uses cutting-edge biomedical imaging techniques to gain information about the way particular genes drive cancer progression.

Our group’s long-term goal is to develop specific biomarkers for detecting cancers and to evaluate these biomarkers in pre-clinical cancer models

Notwithstanding the remarkable clinical success of mAb-based treatment regimens, not all patients benefit from them. This can be attributed, at least in part, to the complexity of the tumour microenvironment and its considerable heterogeneity both in terms of the tumour and non-tumour cell components. These phenomena represent a huge challenge in identifying predictive biomarkers and stratifying patient populations for personalised therapy approaches.

Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop assays that will help in three ways:

  1. accurate patient selection
  2. understanding intrinsic resistance mechanisms or the emergence of acquired resistance following treatment initiation and
  3. choosing the most effective combination regimen in circumstances in which single-agent therapies are insufficiently effective.

Currently, the baseline expression level of antigens targeted by therapeutic mAbs can be analysed by methods such as: immunohistochemistry (IHC), flow cytometry, proteomics, or next-generation sequencing of tumour tissues acquired at diagnostic biopsy or intra-operatively. These techniques aid our understanding of how cancer cells adapt to treatment and become resistant, but such methods are inherently invasive, prone to sampling errors caused by inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity of receptor expression within analysed biopsy specimens and do not lend themselves readily to repeated sampling.

Positron emission tomography (PET), using radiolabelled mAbs, antibody fragments or engineered protein scaffolds (immuno-PET), has the potential to acquire information non-invasively and can be highly complementary to analyses based on tissue acquisition. Accordingly, immuno-PET agents might accurately identify the presence and accessibility of the target and provide a rapid assessment of tumour response to a variety of treatments in a timely fashion (e.g. within 1-2 weeks of treatment initiation).

Furthermore, immuno-PET agents can provide information about the heterogeneity of both target expression and therapeutic response, which are increasingly recognised as key factors in treatment resistance. This especially relates to patients with advanced disease in whom target expression may vary from site to site and a biopsy of a single local or metastatic deposit may not accurately reflect the situation across the entire disease burden. Although introduction of immuno-PET into routine clinical practice may add complexity and increase costs, with appropriate use this imaging modality has the potential to identify patients likely to benefit from therapy and assess the efficacy of novel target-specific drugs.

Against this background, our research focuses on the development and characterisation of targeted-PET radiotracers, including protein-based theranostic agents that enable smart monitoring of immunotherapies and expand opportunities for personalised medicine approaches.

Early diagnosis and individualized therapy have been recognized as crucial for the improvement of cancer treatment outcome. While proper molecular characterization of individual tumour types facilitates choice of the right therapeutic strategies, early assessment of tumour response to therapy could allow the physicians to discontinue ineffective treatment and offer the patient a more promising alternative. Therefore, the role of molecular imaging in elucidating molecular pathways involved in cancer progression and the ability to select the most effective therapy based on the unique biologic characteristics of the patient and the molecular properties of a tumour are undoubtedly of paramount importance.

The mission of this group is to investigate innovative imaging probes and apply them to novel orthotopic or metastatic models that are target driven, to gain information of the way particular oncogenes drive cancer progression through signalling pathways that can be imaged in vivo and, correlate it with target level ex vivo. Such an approach enables non-invasive assessment of biochemical target levels, target modulation and provides opportunities to optimize the drug dosing for maximum therapeutic effect, which leads to the development of better strategies for the more precise delivery of medicine.

The long term goal of our research is to develop specific imaging cancer biomarkers, especially for positron emission tomography (PET) as well as optical imaging and, evaluate these biomarkers in pre-clinical cancer models. Significant efforts are directed towards validating biomarkers for early prediction of treatment response, with the focus on new targeted therapies (such as inhibition of cell signalling pathways).

Our initial portfolio of imaging agents include radiolabelled affibody molecules, TK inhibitors and, conventional tracers that monitor universal markers of tumour physiology.

We are actively supported by other groups from the Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging as well as the Division of Cancer Therapeutics. Moreover, our close association with The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust enables rapid translation of our research to early clinical studies and ensures a fast transition of know-how from the research laboratory to the patient bedside.

Dr Gabriela Kramer-Marek

Group Leader:

Preclinical Molecular Imaging Gabriela Kramer-Marek

Dr Gabriela Kramer-Marek is investigating new ways of molecular imaging in order to predict an individual patient’s response to treatment. Before moving to the ICR, she developed a new approach for non-invasive assessment of HER2 expression in breast cancer.

Researchers in this group

.

Phone: 020 3437 6376

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

.

Phone: +44 20 3437 6785

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

.

Phone: +44 20 3437 6857

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

.

Phone: 020 3437 4549

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

Dr Gabriela Kramer-Marek's group have written 63 publications

Most recent new publication 10/2024

See all their publications

Recent discoveries from this group

16/01/25

Patients with a common aggressive type of bladder cancer could get correct treatment significantly quicker as new research suggests that initial MRI imaging and biopsy could be used to reduce the time patients wait.

In a new study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, a research team led by Professor Nick James of The Institute of Cancer Research, London, and from the University of Birmingham’s Bladder Cancer Research Centre (BCRC) and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU) ran a randomised controlled trial. The trial tested whether adding a type of magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) as the first staging investigation was as effective and quicker than the usual surgical staging for bladder tumours.

TURBT compared with MRI

The study, funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research, saw 143 patients with suspected bladder cancer randomised into two groups, either going through the usual test called transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT), or an initial MRI scan to decide upon the most appropriate next steps.

The team found that patients who were randomised to have MRI had a significant reduction in the time taken to receive their correct treatment with a median time of 53 days from first referral to correct treatment, which was 45 days quicker than the usual standard of care which had a median time of 98 days.

'Speed is of the essence when treating'

Usual tests for muscle invasive bladder cancer involve transurethral resection, which is a surgical procedure carried out under anaesthetic by a surgeon in which a thin telescope inserted through the urethra is used to examine the bladder and remove tumour material.

Rik Bryan, Professor in Urothelial Cancer Research and Director of the Bladder Cancer Research Centre at the University of Birmingham and first author of the study said:

“Bladder cancer is a common cancer and we know that with any cancer, and especially muscle-invasive bladder cancer, speed is of the essence when treating. Any ways to improve the time from initially suspecting cancer to getting the right treatment gives patients the best chance of responding well.

“However, this aspect of the bladder cancer care pathway has remained essentially unchanged worldwide for over 100 years, whilst the rest of medicine and healthcare has innovated around it. We wanted to evaluate whether the 21st century approaches that have benefited the diagnosis and treatment of all other cancer patients would also benefit bladder cancer patients. The BladderPath trial looked at whether adding in some extra or alternative diagnostic testing, mpMRI first then and biopsy or TURBT, could speed up the time taken to receive the correct treatment for the most concerning form of bladder cancer.

“We were delighted that the experimental diagnostic pathway that introduced MRI led to a vastly reduced time taken for patients to receive their correct treatments, from 98 days on average for the usual procedures reduced by more than 6 weeks to 53 days.”

Avoid surgical procedures

Nick James, Professor of Prostate and Bladder Cancer Research at The Institute of Cancer Research, London and Consultant Clinical Oncologist at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, and the study Chief Investigator said:

“This research shows that by adding an MRI pre-biopsy we can cut the time taken to correct treatment for the worst bladder tumours – those that invade the bladder muscle wall – by almost half, from 98 days down to 53 days. We’ve also shown that around 1 in 7 of these patients with problematic tumours can avoid the surgical procedure used to diagnose bladder cancer. As an MRI is considerably cheaper than this surgery, we estimate that this new diagnostic pathway will save money, as well as saving surgical theatre space and preventing patients from undergoing unnecessary procedures. The next step for this research is to assess whether this impacts the survival of these patients."