Systems and Precision Cancer Medicine Group

Dr Anguraj Sadanandam’s Group is investigating methods to classify pancreatic-, colorectal-, breast- and multiple other cancer patients into clinically relevant subgroups.

Professor Anguraj Sadanandam

Group Leader:

Systems and Precision Cancer Medicine anguraj sandanandam

Professor Sadanandam applies the multidisciplinary experience both in the wet-lab and computational biology to identify and test personalised therapies for different cancer types.

Researchers in this group

.

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

.

Phone: +44 20 3437 6920

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

.

Location: Sutton

.

Phone: +44 20 8722 4337

Email: [email protected]

Location: Sutton

Professor Anguraj Sadanandam's group have written 34 publications

Most recent new publication 6/2017

See all their publications

Research, projects and publications in this group

We systematically study tumour and immune/stromal heterogeneity by developing innovative artificial intelligence and machine-learning models to concurrently integrate multi-omics with phenome data.

Cancers are highly heterogeneous at molecular and phenotypic levels that it is essential to stratify these cancer patients for personalised cancer diagnosis and therapy.

To this end, my laboratory’s efforts build on our pioneering molecular stratification in different cancers including colorectal and pancreatic cancers. Nevertheless, we have specific projects in gastroesophageal, breast and pan-cancers (see high impact publications).

We systematically study tumour and immune/stromal heterogeneity by developing innovative artificial intelligence and machine-learning models to concurrently integrate multi-omics with phenome data. Multi-omics data include, but not limited to, image, transcriptome, genome and methylome. Phenome data include clinical outcomes and in vitro/in vivo data such as proliferation, migration, etc.

This careful, systematic approach of integration generates biomarkers and highly probable hypotheses for personalised cancer therapy.

Later, biomarkers are translated to potential molecular assays and tested in the clinic trial/study samples. Similarly, certain hypotheses are validated using mechanism-based pre-clinical cell line and mouse models and experiments.

This approach streamlines solutions to evolving areas in the field of multidisciplinary science including inter/intra-tumoural heterogeneity, companion diagnostic assay development, deconvolution statistical approaches, cell-of-origin/phenotypes-based evolution of tumour, and pre-clinical trials for modelling precision cancer therapy.

Translational cancer research and patient benefit

As a part of the ICR, my interdisciplinary (integrated experimental, computational and clinical biology) laboratory’s research focuses on translational cancer research and patient benefit and leverages national and international clinical trial and tissue resources. Our programme has three overlapping research themes:

1) defining clinically actionable inter/intra-tumoural heterogeneity by systematically integrating multi-omics profiles with phenome data;

2) developing prognostic and/or predictive biomarker-based companion diagnostic assays by dissecting tumour or drug-induced cancer heterogeneity; and

3) identifying and validating subtype-specific drug targets and therapies, specifically those involving immune/stroma pathways, for potential personalised/precision medicine.

Our research is deliberately interdisciplinary to maximise and expedite clinical translation and patient benefit.

Therefore, the existing group, along with clinical collaborators, has three key multidisciplinary components: basic/translational science (pre-clinical and mechanism-based experimental biology; and “Big” data generation); computational biology (development of artificial intelligence and machine learning tools and data analysis); and clinical science (companion diagnostics development; and collaboration-based clinical trial/study-relevant patient samples and data collection).

Our strategic national and international collaborations with industry, large consortia (such as the Colorectal Cancer Subtyping Consortium; CRCSC), leading clinicians across different continents and trial units, bioinformaticians, and biologists support and add value to my laboratory’s activities at the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR).

Furthermore, and focused on patient benefit, we have created an ICR-approved platform to make our companion diagnostic assays (patented already) available internationally for academic research purposes in collaboration.

Finally, we have developed novel bioinformatics and preclinical models, as resources, which are widely and internationally used. Moreover, our lab coordinates multiple cancer research projects related to Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC) specifically related to India.

Our lab is exploring entrepreneurship through various resources for both Sadanandam and group members.

Overall, our groupscience-based research programme aligns well with the ICR/RMH Strategies, the UK’s and international key life sciences strategies, and developing a skilled workforce in interdisciplinary sciences including training clinicians/other disciplinarians in genomic pathology.

Integrated analysis of high-throughput molecular and metabolic profiles to develop pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma subtype-specific therapy

Overall survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) patients is less than 6 months from the time of diagnosis. Currently, patients with advanced or metastatic diseases are treated with gemicitabine, and have only a modest increase in survival. These attributes may reflect the variable and often disappointing responses seen when deploying therapeutic agents in unselected PDAC populations, despite occasional significant responses. Studies in other solid tumours have shown that heterogeneity in therapeutic responses can be anticipated by molecular differences between tumours, and targeting drugs specific to tumour subtypes in which they are predicted to be selectively effective can indeed improve treatment. Seeking to extend this new paradigm, we recently reported three gene expression subtypes of PDA named as classical, quasi-mesenchymal; QM-PDA and exocrine-like PDA using a gene expression signature (62 genes; designated as PDAssigner; Collisson and Sadanandam, et al. Nature Medicine, 2011; co-first author). Interestingly, patients with classical tumours fared better than patients with QM-PDA tumours after resection. We also observed that QM-PDA subtype cell lines are, on average, more sensitive to gemcitabine than the classical subtype lines. The opposite relationship is observed with erlotinib. Along this line, we are interested in characterising the distinct metabolic, genetic and cellular phenotypes of PDA subtypes and their influence on drug responses (precision and personalised medicine) involving wet-lab and bioinformatics by integrating high-throughput molecular and metabolic profiles and correlating the mixed signatures to that of the therapeutic responses.

Characterising colorectal cancer subtypes and integrated analysis of molecular profiles to identify precise therapies

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease that is traditionally classified based on genomic (microsatellite, MSI; or chromosomal instability, CIN) or epigenomic (CpG island methylator phenotype, CIMP) status. In order to achieve a robust and clinically useful means of classification, we performed a novel combination of consensus-based unsupervised clustering of gene expression profiles from patient tumours (n > 1000) to find subtypes within these samples. In total, we identified five integrated CRC subtypes with differential gene expression signatures and prognosis. Namely, we predicted and validated the cellular origin of our subtypes and associated this and the drug responses in order to guide cellular signalling pathway- and mechanism based therapeutic strategies that target subtype-specific tumours. In addition, we also associated our subtypes with (i) MSI status, (ii) Wnt signaling pathway activity, (iii) metastasis to distant organs and (iv) response to targeted and chemotherapy (Sadanandam, et. al., Nature Medicine, 2013). The personalised response of the subtypes to targeted- or chemo-therapy were validated using cell lines in vitro and mouse (xenograft and genetically engineered; cross-species analysis) models in vivo. We will use systems biology approach to extend the characterisation of CRC subtypes in order to facilitate personalised medicine for this devastating disease. In addition, we are interested in understanding cetuximab- and anti-angiogenic therapeutic agents-based adaptive drug resistance in colorectal cancer.

Developing assays using gene signatures that distinguish different subtypes in the clinic

Assigning individual patients to different molecular subtypes require assays that can be used in the clinic. We have developed an exploratory RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry assays that distinguish different subtypes of CRC. Currently, we are interested in further improving these assays and also, developing novel assays involving nCounter platform (Nanostrings Technologies).

Characterising consensus tissue-independent molecular subtypes from different epithelial cancers

We have recently identified subtypes using multiple epithelial type cancers that are independent of tissue specific genes. These subtypes were found to have differential drug responses. We are interested in further characterising these subtypes.

Industrial partnership opportunities with this group

Opportunity: Molecular subtyping and predictive test for personalising colorectal cancer

Commissioner: Professor Anguraj Sadanandam

Recent discoveries from this group

28/01/21

Breast cancer cell

Image: Breast cancer cell. Credit: Anne Weston, Francis Crick Institute, CC BY-NC 4.0 

An already approved breast cancer drug could bring hope to thousands of UK women who have an aggressive form of breast cancer, new research has found.

The study, published in the journal Cancer Research, provides a strong case for a clinical trial to test the value of the drug palbociclib in a specific type of triple negative breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Now-funded researchers at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, identified a defect in some triple negative breast cancers that is linked to poorer outcomes for patients and a drug that targets the consequence of this defect. 

Much needed treatment

The study suggests that the drug palbociclib, which is currently used to treat other breast cancers that have spread to a different part of the body, has the potential to also be used to treat about a fifth of people living with triple negative breast cancer.

This discovery could provide a much-needed targeted treatment for women who are more likely to see their cancer spread sooner, becoming incurable and often resistant to traditional chemotherapy.

Triple negative breast cancer refers to a diverse group of breast cancers that lack the three molecules which are normally used to classify the disease: the oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2).

While these molecules have successfully been used to develop a variety of targeted treatments for other types of breast cancer, the absence of these molecules in triple negative breast cancer means there is a lack of variety in treatment options for this group of breast cancers and as a result triple negative breast cancer is usually treated with a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.

Around 55,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer in the UK every year, and around one in five of these (over 8,000 cases a year in the UK) will be triple negative. This type of breast cancer tends to be more aggressive and disproportionately affects younger women and black women.

This new research, led by Dr Rachael Natrajan, at the Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) has discovered a way to identify triple negative breast tumours that could be more likely to respond to a class of drugs called CDK4/6 inhibitors, including palbociclib.

'Mini-tumours' to mimic growth in the body

The team screened 200 of the most frequently altered genes in breast cancer to investigate how changes in these genes affect cancer’s ability to grow. Using ‘mini-tumours’ grown in the lab that mimic the tumour growth in a human body, researchers found that triple negative breast cancer cells with alterations that caused a decrease in the levels of a protein called CREBBP, could grow faster and more aggressively.

The team then used two large patient databases to further investigate what happens when CREBBP levels in the tumour are low, and found this to be linked to poorer survival rates for patients with triple negative breast cancer. Furthermore, low levels of this protein occur in a variety of other cancers including uterine, ovarian, and some lung and bladder cancers, suggesting it plays a vital role in tumour development or growth.

Understanding what drives growth in specific tumours

They found that when CREBBP levels are low, tumour cells switch to a different way of multiplying relying on proteins called CDK4 and CDK6. These proteins can be blocked with a group of drugs known as CDK4/6 inhibitors, which stops the cancer from growing.

Palbociclib is a CDK4/6 inhibitor that is currently used in the UK to treat some secondary (or metastatic) breast cancers. The researchers tested the effectiveness of palbociclib on cancer cells with CREBBP alterations in the lab and in mice.

The drug was effective even when tested on standard chemotherapy-resistant triple negative breast cancer cells, that lacked CREBBP, donated by a patient.

Overall, this study shows that palbociclib successfully stops the growth of triple negative cancer cells when they have low CREBBP levels, suggesting that this could be a successful new treatment for this type of breast cancer. 

While not all triple negative breast cancer tumours have low CREBBP levels, it is the case in about a fifth of patients. This means that measuring CREBBP protein levels in tumours could help to identify thousands of patients that could benefit from a treatment that is already approved for use in the UK.

A strong case for a clinical trial

Being an already licenced drug, already proven to be safe, means palbociclib can be quickly progressed into clinical trials for triple negative breast cancer and potentially benefit patients sooner. This study provides a strong case for a clinical trial into the use of palbociclib for triple negative breast cancer tumours with low CREBBP levels.

Dr Rachael Natrajan, Team Leader in Functional Genomics at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, said:

“Our study shows what drives the growth of some triple negative breast cancers and suggests the exciting possibility that an already-approved breast cancer drug could be used to help women with this type of disease. 

“Our findings were only possible because we used an innovative model, involving the growth of 3D ‘mini tumours’ in the lab, to more closely reflect how tumours develop in the body.”

'Hugely exciting'

Dr Simon Vincent, Director of Research, Support and Influencing at Breast Cancer Now, said:

“It’s hugely exciting that this research has uncovered a new possible use for palbociclib as a targeted treatment for some women living with triple negative breast cancer.

“Each year, around 8,000 UK women are diagnosed with this aggressive form of breast cancer and we desperately need new, effective ways to treat them and stop them dying from this devastating disease. We hope that if clinical trials confirm that palbociclib is beneficial for some of these women, it will be advanced through the approval process and made available for those who need it as quickly as possible."