Professor Robert Huddart
Group Leader: Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Huddart)
.tmb-propic-sm.jpg?Culture=en&sfvrsn=492e618f_9 "Professor Robert Huddart (2848x2848)")
Biography
Professor Robert Huddart leads the Clinical Academic Radiotherapy group at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, focusing specifically on bladder and testicular cancer. He is one of the ICR’s top scientists in the Everyman laboratories and also an Honorary Consultant in Urological Oncology at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, where he manages and treats patients with urological cancer - cancer that affects the kidney, bladder, prostate, testicles and penis.
Professor Huddart completed a Master of Arts and a Bachelor of Medicine at the University of Oxford, and a Bachelor of Surgery at the University of London before undertaking general medical training in Oxford and Cambridge. He gained membership to the Royal College of Physicians and then moved to The Royal Marsden for specialist training in oncology. Professor Huddart was awarded gold medals in both stages of the examination to become a Fellow of the Royal College of Radiologists. He first joined the ICR to complete a PhD in the molecular biology of testicular cancer with Professor Colin Cooper.
Professor Huddart said:
“Working as a clinical academic at the ICR and The Royal Marsden provides an almost unique opportunity in the UK of working and researching at the cutting edge of oncology, meeting and working with some of the UK's top cancer scientists and being able to investigate and use new technologies and developments. This, combined with the excellence of cancer care within The Royal Marsden, means there is no better place, in my view, for an oncologist to be.”
Current Research
Professor Huddart’s current research focus is improving radiotherapy treatment for bladder cancer, examining the genetic causes of testicular cancer and developing new ways to treat it.
“Clinical oncology as a speciality was attractive to me as a blend of holistic patient care, complex treatment delivery and strong research,” Professor Huddart says. “I got into urological cancer through the opportunity to undertake a PhD on testicular cancer. I was persuaded to stay in this research area by the varied and complex management of the different types of urological cancer, each of which has a unique identity and challenge, as well as the opportunity to advocate for services for male cancer.”
Professor Huddart recently retired (after six years) as Chair of the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) testicular cancer group, and jointly leads the ICR’s postgraduate course in oncology. Most recently, he has qualified for a Postgraduate Certificate in Education from University College, London.
In the future, Professor Huddart hopes to be involved in “developing new personalised treatments which make a real impact on the outlook of the patients we see each week”.
Professor Huddart’s life away from work revolves around his wife and three children. He also competes regularly for a local badminton club.
MA, Oxford University.
MB BS, Middlesex Hospital Medical school, University of London.
PhD, University of London.
MRCP, Royal College of Physcians London.
FRCR, Royal College of Radiologists.
Postgraduate Certificate in Education, University College London.
Frank Doyle medal, Royal College of Radiologists, 1990.
Rohan Williams Medal, Royal College of Radiologists, 1992.
Visiting Professor, Princess Margaret Hospital Toronto.
Editorial BoardsClinical Oncology, 2011.
F1000, 2010.
Testis cancer study group, chair, National Cancer Research Institute, 2003-2009.
Testis cancer study group, member, National Cancer Research Institute, 2009-2015.
Bladder cancer sub group, member, National Cancer Research Institute, 2010.
Bladder cancer sub group, member, National Cancer Research Institute, 2001-2006.
CT rad work stream 3, member, National Cancer Research Institute, 2009.
Education board, member, Royal College of Radiologist, 2001-2006.
Specialist Training Advisory committee, member, Royal College of Radiologist, 2009-2014.
Part 1 examination board, examiner, Royal College of Radiologist, 2000-2006.
MSC course, course director, Institute of Cancer research, 2006.
Bladder Cancer Guideline development group, member, National Institute of Clinical excellence, 2012-2015.
Management group, Founding member, Education Secretary, Trustee, British Uro Oncology Group, 2003.
CT RAD Workstream 3, Co-Chair, National Cancer Research Institute, 2017.
Bladder cancer guidelines, Member, European Society of Medical Oncology, 2019.
Radiotherapy working group (CT RAD), Chair, National Cancer Research Institute, 2022.
Types of Publications
Journal articles
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this phase I trial was to assess the tolerance of cancer patients to focused ultrasound (FUS) treatment in a variety of different sites and to document any associated acute or delayed toxicity. This would appear to be the first time that treatment has been given without sedation or anaesthesia. METHODS: Patients with advanced and/or metastatic disease were eligible for entry into this study. Previous work has established that an in situ ablative intensity (AI) of 1500 W/cm2 Isp for 1 s achieves coagulative necrosis at the focal spot. Ultrasonic exposures of 25-100% of AI for 1 s were delivered to preselected tissue volumes. Pain questionnaires recording any side effects were completed by the patient and the investigator separately. Ultrasound images of the target volume were taken before, immediately after, and 1 week after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients have been entered into this study to date. Seven patients were treated at their primary site and seven received treatment to one of their metastases. No treatment needed to be stopped because of pain. Eight of the 14 patients did not complain of any side effect during or after the treatment. One patient complained of mild, and two of moderate pain during the week following treatment. One patient developed an asymptomatic blister on the skin. CONCLUSION: Focused ultrasound is a safe, well-tolerated and non-invasive method of delivering ablative thermal energy to selected tumours. More clinical trials are needed to assess the role of this modality in the treatment of cancer.
Avascular necrosis (AVN) is known to occur after combination chemotherapy for lymphomas and leukaemias that includes high dose corticosteroids, but it has been reported rarely in patients with solid tumours. We describe five recent cases in young men with testicular tumours (three of which were of good prognosis), who had been treated with chemotherapy using dexamethasone as an antiemetic. Dexamethasone is a low cost and effective antiemetic, but it may be responsible for inducing AVN in patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tumours. A prospective survey of the frequency of AVN is justified to quantify the extent of the problem.
Testicular cancer is a rare tumour with the potential for cure at diagnosis. It is important, however, to identify those patients with metastases at presentation so as to ensure that the optimum treatment strategy is employed. Many criteria have been used to try to place patients into high- or low-risk groups, with variable success. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has the potential to identify active disease and thereby influence further management. Here we report on a retrospective study of the use of FDG-PET in the detection of metastatic testicular carcinoma at diagnosis. Thirty-one patients [13 with seminoma and 18 with non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (13 teratomas, 5 mixed)] were staged by FDG-PET scanning. The imaging was performed using a Siemens ECAT 951 scanner. All results were assessed on the basis of histology or clinical follow-up. FDG-PET scan identified metastatic disease in ten and was negative in 16; there were no false-positives and five false-negatives. There were six patients in whom FDG-PET was negative and computed tomography was regarded as suspicious but follow-up was inconclusive. The positive predictive value was 100%. The negative predictive value was 76% or 91%, depending on whether the aforementioned six cases were regarded as true-negatives or false-negatives. It may be concluded that FDG-PET is capable of detecting metastatic disease at diagnosis that is not identified by other imaging techniques. These preliminary results are sufficient to suggest that a large prospective study should be performed to evaluate the role of FDG-PET in primary staging of disease.
In patients with advanced bladder cancer receiving chemotherapy, early assessment of response can avoid unnecessary toxicity. The aim of this study was to assess the role of tumour markers in monitoring response. Serum levels of one or more of markers beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (betahCG), carcinoembryomic antigen (CEA), CA125 and CA19.9 were measured in 74 patients with advanced bladder cancer receiving chemotherapy from 1992 to 1997. Forty-three of 74 (58%) of patients had at least one raised marker (1.5 times upper limit of normal range). This was more common in patients with extra-pelvic disease than in those with disease confined to the pelvis (P = 0.002). Thirty-eight of 78 (49%) assessable patients had a radiological response. Neither clinical response (P = 0.81) nor survival (P = 0.16) differed between marker-negative and marker-positive patients. Clinical response was strongly related to marker response in the 35 comparable patients (P = 0.0001). No patient had a clinical response without response of at least one marker. Ninety per cent of patients who achieved a marker response had done so by 8 weeks. Monitoring of tumour markers in patients with advanced bladder cancer can help predict the response to chemotherapy.
Differentiation of active disease from fibrosis/mature teratoma in patients with residual masses or identifying of sites of recurrence in patients with raised markers following treatment of their testicular cancer remains a problem.(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has the potential to identify active disease and thereby influence further management in these patients. We performed a retrospective study of the use of FDG-PET in detecting residual/recurrent testicular carcinoma in 55 patients (seventy FDG-PET scans). Forty-seven scans were for the assessment of residual masses (18 had raised markers) and 23 scans were for the investigation of raised markers in the presence of normal CT scans. True positive results were based on positive histology or clinical follow-up. FDG-PET had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 96% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 90% in patients with residual masses. This PPV was equivalent to that of markers (94%) but FDG-PET had the advantage of identifying the site of that recurrence. The NPV was higher than that of markers. In patients with raised markers alone the PPV of FDG-PET was 92% but the NPV was only 50%. However, subsequent FDG-PET imaging was frequently the first imaging modality to identify the site of disease. FDG-PET effected a management change in 57% of cases. FDG-PET scanning detected viable tumour in residual masses and identified sites of disease in suspected recurrence.
PURPOSE: To assess the results of treatment in 33 patients with stage IIA/B seminoma who were treated with carboplatin and radiotherapy (RT) between January 1989 and December 1996. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients received single course single agent carboplatin (400 mg/m2 or area under curve (AUC 7), two patients received two courses carboplatin, and one patient received single course carboplatin and etoposide, all 4-6 weeks prior to infra-diaphragmatic RT. Results were retrospectively compared with those obtained for 80 patients treated from 1970 to 1998 with radiotherapy alone. RESULTS: There was minimal toxicity associated with the use of carboplatin prior to RT. With a median follow-up of 4 years (range 2-70 months) 2/33 patients treated with chemotherapy and RT have relapsed, 5-year relapse free survival (RFS) = 96.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 72.9-99.4%), and one patient has died of progressive disease, 5-year overall survival (OS) = 96.7%. With a median follow-up of 11.2 years (range 6 months to 25.8 years) 15/80 patients treated with RT alone have relapsed, 5-year RFS = 80.7% (95% CI 70.1-87.9%), including 13/61 patients treated with infra-diaphragmatic RT, 5-year RFS = 77.9%, and 2/19 treated with additional supra-diaphragmatic RT, 5-year RFS = 89.5% (P = 0.277). Eleven out of 80 patients have died, 5-year OS = 94.7%. For stage IIA, 1/14 patients treated with chemotherapy and RT have relapsed, 5-year RFS = 92.3%, compared with 5/34 treated with infra-diaphragmatic RT alone 5-year, RFS = 84.9% (P = 0.527). For stage IIB, 1/19 patients relapsed (at 69 months) following chemotherapy and RT (5-year RFS = 100%), whereas 8/27 relapsed following infra-diaphragmatic RT alone, 5-year RFS = 69.4% (P = 0.0595). CONCLUSION: Infradiaphragmatic RT alone cures the majority of patients with stage II seminoma, but the relapse rate remains high particularly for patients with stage IIB disease. As compared with historical controls, carboplatin with RT appears to reduce the relapse rate in stage II seminoma with minimal additional toxicity and the results approach statistical significance for stage IIB patients. Confirmation would require a phase III randomized comparison.
To evaluate an alternative treatment for advanced or metastatic urothelial cancers, a dose-intensive combination chemotherapy regimen using carboplatin, methotrexate, vincristine and cisplatin was given to 60 patients over a 3-year period (1990 to 1993). There were 26 patients with locally advanced disease and 34 with metastatic disease; 49 patients were evaluable for response. A complete response was noted in four patients (8%) and a partial response in 15 (31%), for an overall response rate of 39%. The median survival was 12 months. Two- and 5-year survival rates were 25.5% (95% confidence interval CI) 15.2-37.0) and 7.3% (95% CI 2.2-16.4) respectively. Failure-free survival was 15.3% (95% CI 7.5-25.6) at 2 years and 5.9% (95% CI 1.6-14.4) at 5 years, with a median of 8 months. For the responders, the median duration of response was 14 months, with a range of 2-59+ months. Toxicity included myelosuppression (28% grade 4/5 neutropenia, 19% grade 4 thrombocytopenia), peripheral neuropathy (54% grade 1 and 23% grade 2/3) and ototoxicity (21% grade 1, 19% grade 2). This schedule of dose-intensified platinum-based chemotherapy for bladder cancer resulted in significant neurotoxicity without evidence of enhanced response rates or survival. Regimens such as methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin should remain standard. Accelerated regimens may be useful in situations were it is necessary to administer chemotherapy over a short time (e.g. as part of combined modality treatment).
To study the prevalence of avascular necrosis in patients receiving chemotherapy for testicular cancer we invited 103 consecutive patients treated by chemotherapy to attend for MRI scan of the hips. Four of 47 (9% (CI 2-20%)) patients scanned and 4/103 (3.8% (CI 1-10%)) of patients invited to participate in the study had evidence of avascular necrosis. As not all patients in the study had completed the at risk period this equates to a 3-year actuarial risk of 6.3% (95% confidence limits (CI) 2.4-16.1). These data suggest that avascular necrosis is an uncommon but significant complication of chemotherapy including steroids as anti-emetics.
Phase III studies have demonstrated the clinical benefit of adding neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation to radical radiotherapy for clinically localised prostate cancer. We have developed a nomogram to describe the probability of PSA control for patients treated in this way. Five hundred and seventeen men with clinically localised prostate cancer were treated with 3-6 months of neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation and radical radiotherapy (64Gy in 32#) between 1988 and 1998. Median presenting PSA was 20 ng x ml(-1), and 56% of patients had T3/4 disease. Multivariate analysis of pre-treatment factors was performed, and a nomogram developed to describe PSA-failure-free survival probability. At a median follow-up of 44 months, 233 men had developed PSA failure. Presenting PSA, histological grade and clinical T stage were all highly predictive of PSA failure on multivariate analysis. The nomogram score for an individual patient is given by the summation of PSA (<10=0, 10-19=16, 20-49=44, > or =50=100), grade (Gleason 2-4=0, 5-7=44, 8-10=81) and T stage (T1/2=0, T3/4=35). For a nomogram score of 0, 50, 100 and 150 points the 2 year PSA control rate was 93, 87, 75 and 54%, and the 5 year PSA control rate was 82, 67, 44 and 18%. These results are comparable to those using surgery or higher doses of radical radiotherapy alone. The nomogram illustrates the results of multivariate analysis in a visually-striking way, and facilitates comparisons with other treatment methods.
BACKGROUND: A mass may persist in the para-aortic region after patients undergo chemotherapy for metastatic, nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis (NSGCT). Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy removes the mass, which may contain residual active malignancy, and allows histologic assessment of the effectiveness of the chemotherapy. Whereas some have favored early, elective removal of such masses, others have chosen to observe them, reserving salvage surgery for patients who experience disease recurrence. A retrospective analysis was undertaken to define the outcome in these two groups of patients. METHODS: After receiving chemotherapy for metastatic NSGCT, 442 men underwent lymphadenectomy for residual masses (measuring > or = 1 cm in greatest dimension) between 1976 and 1999, inclusive. Three hundred thirty men underwent elective surgery within 3 months of the completion of chemotherapy, and 112 men underwent salvage surgery after receiving reinduction chemotherapy for tumor recurrence. RESULTS: The residual mass was removed completely in 87% and 72% of patients in the elective and salvage lymphadenectomy groups, respectively; was removed with difficulty and possibly incompletely in 9% and 21% of patients, respectively; and was definitely removed incompletely in 4% and 7% of patients, respectively. The operative mortality rate was 0.9% in the elective surgery group and 1.8% in the salvage surgery group. There was malignant teratoma, undifferentiated in 8.5% of patients in the elective surgery group and in 49% of patients in the salvage surgery group (P < 0.001). Differentiated teratoma and necrosis/fibrosis were present in 66.0% and 25.4% of patients in the elective surgery group, respectively, and in 38.4% and 12.5% of patients in the salvage surgery group, respectively. The authors were unable to produce a clinically useful model to predict the presence of necrosis/fibrosis only in either group. The 5-year recurrence free and overall survival rates were 83% and 89%, respectively, in the elective surgery group and 62% and 56%, respectively, in the salvage surgery group. For the salvage surgery group, the completeness of surgical excision and the presence of undifferentiated teratoma were of overriding importance for overall survival. A variety of other patient-related, tumor-related, and surgery-related factors also were significant in the final model for the elective surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: The current results demonstrate the low level of morbidity that can be obtained, even in the salvage surgery group, and the importance of complete surgical resection in this setting. Because it is not possible to predict with sufficient accuracy which patients will have favorable pathology (necrosis/fibrosis), the authors continue to recommend elective surgery for all suitable men with residual masses after they receive first-line chemotherapy.
We tested the feasibility and toxicity of high activities Rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate, with peripheral blood stem cell rescue in patients with progressive hormone refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Twenty-five patients received between 2500 and 5000 MBq of Rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate followed 14 days later by the return of peripheral blood peripheral blood stem cells. Activity limiting toxicity was defined as grade III haematological toxicity, lasting at least 7 days, or grade IV haematological toxicity of any duration or any serious unexpected toxicity. Activity limiting toxicity occurred in two of six who received activities of 5000 MBq and maximum tolerated activity was defined at this activity level. Prostate specific antigen reductions of 50% or more lasting at least 4 weeks were seen in five of the 25 patients (20%) all of whom received more than 3500 MBq of Rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate. The actuarial survival at 1 year is 54%. Administered activities of 5000 MBq of Rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate are feasible using autologous peripheral blood peripheral blood stem cell rescue in patients with progressive hormone refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone. The main toxicity is thrombocytopaenia, which is short lasting. A statistically significant activity/prostate specific antigen response was seen. We have now commenced a Phase II trial to further evaluate response rates.
Superficial bladder cancer has an unpredictable natural history but in many patients it has a tendency for multiple recurrences over many years. Chemoprevention approaches are ideally tested in this type of tumor and may delay or prevent recurrences of superficial bladder cancer or prevent progression to invasive disease. Vitamin A and its derivatives, the retinoids, have been studied in detail in this disease. This article reviews the data on this subject and includes in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies as well as the clinical studies performed in the secondary prevention of this disease.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the assessment and management of early germ-cell tumours. RECENT FINDINGS: A role has evolved for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I disease postorchidectomy and in the primary management of stage II disease. SUMMARY: A range of approaches offer high survival in early germ-cell tumours. Treatment should factor in patient choice and resource issues. More sensitive imaging with Positron Emission Tomography may allow more appropriate treatment decisions.
BACKGROUND: Testicular germ cell tumors are highly curable. However, 10-30% of patients have recurrence after initial treatment. The time-course of recurrence has implications for the duration of follow-up. This study was undertaken to assess the risk and time-course of recurrence and to identify patients at higher risk of late recurrence. METHODS: The records of 1263 patients with primary testicular germ cell tumors presenting to the Royal Marsden Hospital between December 1979 and December 1993 were reviewed. In all, 255 episodes of recurrence were documented (including 44 patients with multiple recurrences) and used to calculate recurrence-free survivals. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (15 seminomas; 38 nonseminomatous germ cell tumors [NSGCT]) had recurrence more than 2 years after initial presentation. A multivariate analysis of risk of recurrence after 2 years identified positive markers at presentation and the presence of differentiated teratomas in postchemotherapy surgical specimens as significant predictors. Very late recurrence (> 5 years) occurred mainly in patients with metastatic NSGCT (12 of 14 patients) with a 1% annual risk of recurrence between 5 and 10 years. Very late recurrence was also seen in one case of metastatic seminoma and one case of Stage I NSGCT managed by surveillance. Most late recurrences (n = 9) were detected at routine annual follow-up visits but five had recurrences with symptoms leading to an unscheduled clinic visit. CONCLUSION: Late recurrences are rare in patients with testicular germ cell tumors and follow-up to detect recurrence may not be needed after 5 years, except in those presenting with metastatic NSGCTs.
BACKGROUND: Bleomycin pulmonary toxicity (BPT) has been known since the early clinical trials of bleomycin in the 1960s. Postulated risk factors include cumulative bleomycin dose, reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), raised creatinine, older age and supplemental oxygen exposure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From our prospectively collected testicular cancer research database, we reviewed 835 patients treated at the Royal Marsden NHS Trust (Sutton, UK) with bleomycin-containing regimens for germ-cell tumours between January 1982 and December 1999, to identify those with BPT. RESULTS: Fifty-seven (6.8%) patients had BPT, ranging from X-ray/CT (computed tomography) changes to dyspnoea. There were eight deaths (1% of patients treated) directly attributed to BPT. The median time from the start of bleomycin administration to documented lung toxicity was 4.2 months (range 1.2-8.2). On multivariate analysis, the factors independently predicting for increased risk of BPT were GFR <80 ml/min [hazard ratio (HR) 3.3], age >40 years (HR 2.3), stage IV disease at presentation (HR 2.6) and cumulative dose of bleomycin >300,000 IU (HR 3.5). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with poor renal function are at high risk of BPT, especially if they are aged >40 years, have stage IV disease at presentation or receive >300,000 IU of bleomycin. In such cases alternative drug regimens or dose restriction should be considered.
PURPOSE: Despite a high cure rate in patients with testicular cancer, there remain patients in the poor prognosis group who have a less favorable outcome. Intensive induction chemotherapy using a regimen consisting of carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine, and cisplatin, followed by bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (CBOP/BEP), developed at the Royal Marsden Hospital, is designed to overcome the rapid proliferation seen in germ cell tumors. This study assesses the outcome of patients with poor-prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) treated with CBOP/BEP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with NSGCT from three centers, classified as poor prognosis according to International Germ Cell Classification Consensus Group criteria, were treated with CBOP/BEP regimen during the period from 1989 to 2000. Data on treatment toxicity, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were collected prospectively on a hospital database. RESULTS: Fifty-four male patients with poor prognosis NSGCT were treated with CBOP/BEP. The RFS at 3 and 5 years for all patients was 83.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.8% to 91.3%). After a median follow-up of 4 years, the OS of the 54 patients was 91.5% (95% CI, 78.6% to 96.8%) at 3 years and 87.6% (95% CI, 71.3% to 94.9%) at 5 years. Three-year OS in patients with a primary mediastinal germ cell tumor was 77.1% (95% CI, 34.5% to 93.9%) compared with 95.4% (95% CI, 82.8% to 98.8%) in patients with a testicular primary tumor (P =.24). CONCLUSION: The results reported here compare favorably with the historical results of alternative regimens used in the management of poor-prognosis NSGCT. We suggest a phase III trial to confirm our findings.
PURPOSE: To assess the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and cardiac risk factors in long-term survivors of testicular cancer according to treatment received. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All resident male patients registered in the United Kingdom between 1982 and 1992 attending for follow-up were eligible for recruitment. Patients completed a current health questionnaire and underwent clinical review, along with hematologic, biochemical, and hormonal profiles. For patients not under routine review, follow-up information was sought from their general practitioner and mortality data were sought from the Office of National Statistics. Descriptive analysis was performed on all variables and comparisons were made among patients treated by orchidectomy and follow-up only, chemotherapy alone (C), radiotherapy alone (RT), and radiotherapy and chemotherapy (C/RT). RESULTS: Data on cardiovascular events were available on 992 patients. After a median follow-up of 10.2 years, 68 events had been reported, including 18 deaths. After adjusting for age, increased risk for cardiac events was seen after C (relative risk [RR] = 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 5.84; P =.022), RT (RR = 2.40; 95% CI, 1.04 to 5.45; P =.036), and C/RT (RR = 2.78; 95% CI, 1.09 to 7.07; P =.032). There were no significant differences in cardiac risk factors. On multivariate analysis, age, treatment group, free thyroxine, protein, and magnesium levels were associated with cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSION: In long-term survivors of testicular cancer, we observed a two-fold or greater risk of developing cardiovascular disease. This was not due to increases in cardiac risk factors, which suggests a direct or indirect treatment effect. These data support the continued research into the minimization of treatment in good-prognosis testicular cancer.
Radical radiotherapy is a standard form of management of localised prostate cancer. Conformal treatment planning spares adjacent normal tissues reducing treatment-related side effects and may permit safe dose escalation. We have tested the effects on tumour control and side effects of escalating radiotherapy dose and investigated the appropriate target volume margin. After an initial 3-6 month period of androgen suppression, 126 men were randomised and treated with radiotherapy using a 2 by 2 factorial trial design. The initial radiotherapy tumour target volume included the prostate and base of seminal vesicles (SV) or complete SV depending on SV involvement risk. Treatments were randomised to deliver a dose of 64 Gy with either a 1.0 or 1.5 cm margin around the tumour volume (1.0 and 1.5 cm margin groups) and also to treat either with or without a 10 Gy boost to the prostate alone with no additional margin (64 and 74 Gy groups). Tumour control was monitored by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and clinical examination with additional tests as appropriate. Acute and late side effects of treatment were measured using the Radiation Treatment and Oncology Groups (RTOG) and LENT SOM systems. The results showed that freedom from PSA failure was higher in the 74 Gy group compared to the 64 Gy group, but this did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance with 5-year actuarial control rates of 71% (95% CI 58-81%) in the 74 Gy group vs 59% (95% CI 45-70%) in the 64 Gy group. There were 23 failures in the 74 Gy group and 33 in the 64 Gy group (Hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.38-1.10, P=0.10). No difference in disease control was seen between the 1.0 and 1.5 cm margin groups (5-year actuarial control rates 67%, 95% CI 53-77% vs 63%, 95% CI 50-74%) with 28 events in each group (Hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.50-1.86, P=0.94). Acute side effects were generally mild and 18 weeks after treatment, only four and five of the 126 men had persistent > or =Grade 1 bowel or bladder side effects, respectively. Statistically significant increases in acute bladder side effects were seen after treatment in the men receiving 74 Gy (P=0.006), and increases in both acute bowel side effects during treatment (P=0.05) and acute bladder sequelae (P=0.002) were recorded for men in the 1.5 cm margin group. While statistically significant, these differences were of short duration and of doubtful clinical importance. Late bowel side effects (RTOG> or =2) were seen more commonly in the 74 Gy and 1.5 cm margin groups (P=0.02 and P=0.05, respectively) in the first 2 years after randomisation. Similar results were found using the LENT SOM assessments. No significant differences in late bladder side effects were seen between the randomised groups using the RTOG scoring system. Using the LENT SOM instrument, a higher proportion of men treated in the 74 Gy group had Grade > or =3 urinary frequency at 6 and 12 months. Compared to baseline scores, bladder symptoms improved after 6 months or more follow-up in all groups. Sexual function deteriorated after treatment with the number of men reporting some sexual dysfunction (Grade> or =1) increasing from 38% at baseline to 66% at 6 months and 1 year and 81% by year 5. However, no consistent differences were seen between the randomised groups. In conclusion, dose escalation from 64 to 74 Gy using conformal radiotherapy may improve long-term PSA control, but a treatment margin of 1.5 cm is unnecessary and is associated with increased acute bowel and bladder reactions and more late rectal side effects. Data from this randomised pilot study informed the Data Monitoring Committee of the Medical Research Council RT 01 Trial and the two studies will be combined in subsequent meta-analysis.
Testicular cancer is remarkable because it is curable by combination cytotoxic chemotherapy even when widely disseminated. Treatment is defined by widely accepted staging and prognostic factors. Three cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin has been defined as the current optimum treatment in good prognosis metastatic disease, curing 90-95% of patients. Outcomes are less impressive for patients in intermediate and poor prognostic categories. A number of different approaches, including introduction of new agents and dose intensification, are being investigated to improve outcomes in these patients. Data developed over the last few years have identified increased risks of second malignancy and cardiovascular disease in long-term survivors. This has led to re-evaluation of strategies to manage Stage I patients. In particular, the use of radiotherapy in Stage I seminoma and the need for adjuvant therapy in Stage I nonseminoma are being re-examined. It is anticipated that advances in imaging and prognostic factors will facilitate this process.
There is good evidence that radiation dose escalation in localised prostate cancer is associated with increased cell kill. The traditional two-dimensional (2D) technique of treatment planning and delivery is limited by normal tissue toxicity, such that the dose that can be safely delivered to the prostate by external beam radiotherapy is 65-70 Gy. Several technological advances over the last 20 years have enhanced the precision of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and have resulted in improved outcomes. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) approach reduces the dose-limiting late side-effect of proctitis and has allowed for dose escalation to the whole prostate to 78 Gy. More recently, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), an advanced form of conformal therapy, has resulted in reduced rectal toxicity when using doses greater than 80 Gy. In addition, IMRT can potentially escalate the dose to specific parts of the prostate where there are resistant subpopulations of tumour clonogens, or can be used to extend the high-dose region to pelvic lymph nodes. The addition of androgen deprivation to conventional radiotherapy has an impact on survival and local control. Initial hormone therapy causes cytoreduction of the prostate cancer allowing for a reduction in radiotherapy volume as well as an additive effect on cell kill. Long-term adjuvant androgen deprivation has been shown to improve overall survival in more advanced tumours. Prostate brachytherapy is now a recognised treatment for those with low-risk disease. It achieves similar long-term outcome to other treatment modalities. Brachytherapy can be used as monotherapy for localised disease, or as boost treatment following conventional EBRT for locally advanced disease. New techniques are available to improve the precision of both target definition and treatment verification. This so-called image-guided radiotherapy will help to enhance the accuracy of dose delivery by correcting both for inter-fraction positional variation and for intra-fraction movement of the prostate in real-time and will allow for tighter tumour margins and avoidance of normal tissues, thereby enhancing the safety of treatment.
AIMS: To evaluate the prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tumour stage in clinically localised prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 1999, 199 men with clinically localised prostate cancer (T -T4, N0/Nx, M0) were treated with neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation and radical radiotherapy, and were staged using MRI. Concordance between clinical tumour (cT) stage, as determined by digital rectal examination, and MRI tumour (mT) stage was assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model were used to study the prognostic role of cT stage and mT stage in addition to established prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of these 199 patients, 103 (52%) were upstaged on MRI, seven (3%) were downstaged, and in 89 (45%) cT and mT stages were concordant. With median follow-up of 3.8 years, 5-year freedom from prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure was 48% (95% confidence interval (CI) 39-56%). On univariate analysis, freedom from PSA failure was associated with mT stage (P = 0.009) as well as Gleason score (P < 0.001) and initial PSA (P < 0.001), but not cT stage (P = 0.449). On multivariate analysis, Gleason score (P = 0.001), initial PSA (P < 0.001), but not mT stage (P = 0.112) remained independent determinants of freedom from PSA failure. For the subgroup of 149 patients with cT1-2 disease, mT stage was a significant predictor of increased risk of PSA failure on univariate analysis (P = 0.005), but not multivariate analysis (P = 0.19). CONCLUSION: Freedom from PSA failure was more closely associated with mT stage than cT stage. Future studies are warranted to determine whether mT stage is an independent determinant of treatment outcome.
Modern treatments cure most testicular cancer patients, so an important goal is to minimise toxicity. Fertility and sexual functioning are key issues for patients. We have evaluated these outcomes in a cross-sectional study of long-term survivors of testicular cancer. In total, 680 patients treated between 1982 and 1992 completed the EORTC Qly-C-30(qc30) questionnaire, the associated testicular cancer specific module and a general health and fertility questionnaire. Patients have been subdivided according to treatment received: orchidectomy either alone (surveillance, S n = 169), with chemotherapy (C, n = 272), radiotherapy (R, n = 158), or both chemotherapy and radiotherapy (C/RT n = 81). In the surveillance group, 6% of patients had an elevated LH, 41% an elevated FSH and 11% a low (< 10 nmol l(-1)) testosterone. Hormonal function deteriorated with additional treatment, but the effect in general was small. Low testosterone was more common in the C/RT group (37% P = 0.006), FSH abnormalities were more common after chemotherapy (C 49%, C/RT 71% both P < 0.005) and LH abnormalities after radiotherapy (11% P < 0.01) and chemotherapy (10%, P < 0.001). Baseline hormone data were available for 367 patients. After treatment, compared to baseline, patients receiving chemotherapy had significantly greater elevations of FSH (median rise of 6 (IQR 3-9.25) iu l(-1) compared to 3 (IQR 1-5) iu l(-1) for S; P < 0.001) and a fall (compared to a rise in the surveillance group) in median testosterone levels (-2 (IQR -8.0 to -1.5) vs 1.0. (IQR -4.0-4.0) P < 0.001). Patients with low testosterone (but not elevated FSH) had lower quality of life scores related to sexual functioning on the testicular cancer specific module and lower physical, social and role functioning on the EORTC Qly C-30. Patients with a low testosterone also had higher body mass index and blood pressure. Treatment was associated with reduction in sexual activity and patients receiving chemotherapy had more concerns about fathering children. In total, 207 (30%) patients reported attempting conception of whom 159 (77%) were successful and a further 10 patients were successful after infertility treatment with an overall success rate of 82%. There was a lower overall success rate after chemotherapy (C 71%; CRT 67% compared to S 85% (P = 0.028)). Elevated FSH levels were associated with reduced fertility (normal FSH 91% vs elevated 68% P < 0.001). In summary, gonadal dysfunction is common in patients with a history of testicular cancer even when managed by orchidectomy alone. Treatment with chemotherapy in particular can result in additional impairment. Gonadal dysfunction reduces quality of life and has an adverse effect on patient health. Most patients retain their fertility, but the risk of infertility is likely to be increased by chemotherapy. Screening for gonadal dysfunction should be considered in the follow-up of testicular cancer survivors.
This case was the subject of a Grand Round Presentation at the Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK on 8 June 2004. A case of metachronous, bilateral testicular germ-cell tumours (TGCTs) arising in a patient with a family history of this disease was presented. The second primary was managed conservatively. The rationale and outcome of this approach was presented, along with a discussion of the management of early stage TGCTs and the genetics of familial and bilateral disease.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the time-course of recovery of serum testosterone levels after a short course of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRHa) and radical radiotherapy to the prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were sequentially measured prospectively in 59 men who received short-course LHRHa treatment and radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Measurements were made before treatment (baseline), during LHRHa treatment, and at 6, 12, 18, 24 and >40 weeks after the last LHRHa injection. RESULTS: The median (range) time from the first to last LHRHa injection was 116 (54-194) days. The mean (95% confidence interval) testosterone levels (in nmol/L) at baseline, during treatment and at 6, 12, 18, 24 and >40 weeks afterward were 12.0 (10.8-13.1), 0.6 (0.5-0.7), 1.4 (0.6-2.2), 11.4 (9.7-13), 12.2 (10.5-14), 10.4 (8.9-12) and 11.7 (10.5-13). Four men had low baseline testosterone levels (<6.1 nmol/L). At 6 weeks after the last LHRHa injection, no men had testosterone levels in the 'normal' range; 35% were in the normal range at 12 weeks, 85% at 18 weeks, 89% at 24 weeks, and 96% at 1 year. CONCLUSION: After LHRHa treatment and radiotherapy, the testosterone levels of most men had recovered to normal by 18-24 weeks after the last LHRHa injection.
AIMS: To describe the distribution of enlarged lymph nodes by nodal group found radiologically in patients presenting with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. This will help to define which nodal groups should be treated during the pelvic radiotherapy of patients with less advanced disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The scans of 55 men presenting with prostate cancer and metastases to lymph nodes only were reviewed. Lymph nodes of 8 mm or more in size were considered to be enlarged. RESULTS: The medial external iliac (obturator) nodes were most commonly enlarged (75% of patients) followed by nodes in the para-aortic region (26%) and anterior internal iliac region (24%). Para-aortic lymph-node enlargement was uncommon in the absence of pelvic lymphadenopathy. Midline pre-sacral lymph-node enlargement was not observed. Incidence of enlarged lymph nodes in the lateral external iliac group was 18%, an area which may not be routinely included during radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: There is a case for studying further the role of including lateral external iliac lymph nodes in the pelvic radiotherapy volume, as there may be an appreciable risk of lymph-node spread to this area.
PURPOSE: We investigated the potential for improvement in disease control by use of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) to permit administration of high activities of (186)Re-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP) in patients with progressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: Eligible patients had progressive HRPC metastatic to bone, good performance status and minimal soft tissue disease. Patients received 5,000 MBq of (186)Re-HEDP i.v., followed 14 days later by PBSCT. Response was assessed using PSA, survival, pain scores and quality of life. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with a median age of 67 years (range 50-77) and a median PSA of 57 ng/ml (range 4-3,628) received a median activity of 4,978 MBq (186)Re-HEDP (range 4,770-5,100 MBq). The most serious toxicity was short-lived grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 8 (21%) patients. The median survival of the group is 21 months (95%CI 18-24 months) with Kaplan-Meier estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates of 83% and 40% respectively. Thirty-one patients (81%, 95% CI 66-90%) had stable or reduced PSA levels 3 months post therapy while 11 (29%, 95% CI 15-49%) had PSA reductions of >50% lasting >4 weeks. Quality of life measures were stable or improved in 27 (66%) at 3 months. CONCLUSION: We have shown that it is feasible and safe to deliver high-activity radioisotope therapy with PBSCT to men with metastatic HRPC. Response rates and survival data are encouraging; however, further research is needed to define optimal role of this treatment approach.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients receiving radical radiotherapy to the prostate are requested to maintain a full bladder to displace the dome of the bladder and small bowel from the target volume. This study investigated patients' ability to consistently maintain a full bladder throughout planning and treatment before (Study 1) and after (Study 2) the introduction of a patient information sheet. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bladder volumes were measured on 41 patients at CT scanning, simulation and once weekly during treatment using a portable ultrasound device, BladderScan BVI 3000. Patients were asked their assessment of bladder fullness, time since last urination and the volume of fluid drank. A patient information sheet on bladder filling was then introduced and the study repeated on 25 patients (Study 2). The ultrasound bladder volumes measured at CT were compared to the CT scan data. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the ultrasound and CT bladder volumes r = 0.88 (P < 0.01). There was a significant decrease between the volume at CT (mean 362 ml, SD 229 ml) and treatment (mean 251 ml, SD 171 ml) in Study 1 (P = 0.002). In Study 2 the mean volume at CT was 286 ml (SD 164 ml) compared to a mean of 312 ml (SD 196 ml) during treatment. The measured volume correlated with patient self-assessment (r = 0.47, P < 0.01). The median volume drank by patients in Study 2 was 350 ml (range 50-825 ml) compared to 450 ml (range 75-1500 ml) in Study 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial results showed patients were unable to maintain a constant bladder volume during planning and treatment. Implementation of written bladder filling instructions was shown to improve bladder volume consistency.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the rate of relapse in men with stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) of the testis treated with one cycle of chemotherapy instead of the usual two cycles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 1996, 22 men with stage I NSGCT who had normalized tumour markers after orchidectomy and negative findings on computed tomography, and who were at moderate risk of relapse, were treated with one cycle of platinum-containing chemotherapy (bleomycin and etoposide with either cisplatin or carboplatin). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 10.2 years, none of the patients have relapsed with malignant GCTs. CONCLUSION: The results after one cycle of chemotherapy are no worse than after two cycles. The present study needs to be replicated in a larger cohort of patients to define the relapse risk more accurately. This approach is soon to be tested in a large multicentre trial randomizing patients between one and two cycles.
AIMS: The radiation dose used to treat bladder cancer is limited by the risk of inducing severe late bladder toxicity. Retrospective data suggest that radiation tolerance is greater for partial rather than whole bladder irradiation. Limiting the high-dose region to a section of the bladder may reduce toxicity, opening the way for dose escalation. The aims of this study were to establish the efficacy and compare the late toxicity between (1) a two-phase technique limiting the high-dose area and (2) a conventional single-phase radiotherapy to the whole bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort study was undertaken of 229 patients with invasive bladder cancer treated with computed tomography-planned radical radiotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital from 1984 to 1998. In total, 154 patients received a single-phase treatment to the whole bladder with a 2 cm margin. Seventy-five patients with solitary, well-localised tumours were selected for treatment using a two-phase technique. The first phase (12 Gy) aimed to treat the tumour with a 2 cm margin. A second phase treated the whole bladder with 52 Gy. One hundred and forty-one patients were planned to receive a dose of 60-64 Gy/30-32 fractions over 6-6.5 weeks, whereas 88 patients received an accelerated regime. Data on late bladder and bowel toxicity (using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria) were collected prospectively at the annual review. RESULTS: At the 5-year follow-up there was no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.64-1.3) or failure-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.43) between the two techniques. The two-phase reduced volume treatment was less toxic, with a 19% absolute reduction in overall grade 3-4 late toxicity (P = 0.02). These differences were more marked for bladder toxicity compared with bowel toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The two-phase reduced volume technique was associated with less bladder and bowel toxicity than conventional whole bladder radiotherapy without evidence of impaired survival.
Non-surgical management of malignant jaundice is becoming widespread in referral centres and the results are good. We report a retrospective analysis of 46 patients with malignant jaundice who were treated with either endoscopic or combined percutaneous endoscopic biliary stenting in a district general hospital. Out of 46 patients, 24 were stented successfully endoscopically and 19 of the remaining 22 patients were put forward for the combined procedure, and 12 had successful stenting. Eight were managed with palliative bypass surgery and two died. The procedure related mortality was 6.9% and the 30 day mortality was 4.6%. Good palliation of patients with malignant jaundice is achievable in small centres providing there is good radiological and surgical back-up.
AIMS: With a life expectancy similar to the general population, greater numbers of patients with Down's syndrome are being diagnosed with testicular cancer. Learning difficulties and medical co-morbidity are common in this patient population and may lead to non-standard oncological treatment. We aimed to identify and discuss management challenges in the treatment of these patients with chemotherapy and radiotherapy and report their clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Royal Marsden Hospital urology database was searched from 1982 to 2005 to identify all cases of patients with Down's syndrome and histologically confirmed testicular cancer who were referred for consideration of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. RESULTS: Nine patients were identified, of whom eight received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Two patients had bilateral tumours and four had crypto-orchidism. At the time of diagnosis, the patients were 21-50 years of age. Of the 11 tumours identified, nine were seminomas and two were malignant teratoma undifferentiated. Five patients presented with stage I disease, of whom three received carboplatin and one received para-aortic radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment. Three patients presented with stage II disease, of whom two were treated with carboplatin and one received combination chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy. One patient with stage IV disease was treated with carboplatin. Five of nine patients relapsed within 30 months, of whom three were successfully salvaged with radiotherapy and one with combination chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: After standard and non-standard therapy for seminoma, the relapse rate for patients in our cohort was high. Since relapsed disease is much more difficult to manage with combination chemotherapy on account of respiratory, cardiac and renal co-morbidity, adequate initial treatment is advised. Consideration of psycho-social issues and the multiple treatment strategies available is vital in delivering optimal care to patients with Down's syndrome and testicular cancer.
BACKGROUND: Five-year disease-free survival rates for localised prostate cancer following standard doses of conventional radical external beam radiotherapy are around 80%. Conformal radiotherapy (CFRT) raises the possibility that radiotherapy doses can be increased and long-term efficacy outcomes improved, with safety an important consideration. METHODS: MRC RT01 is a randomised controlled trial of 862 men with localised prostate cancer comparing Standard CFRT (64Gy/32f) versus Escalated CFRT (74Gy/37f), both administered with neo-adjuvant androgen suppression. Early toxicity was measured using physician-reported instruments (RTOG, LENT/SOM, Royal Marsden Scales) and patient-reported questionnaires (MOS SF-36, UCLA Prostate Cancer Index, FACT-P). RESULTS: Overall early radiotherapy toxicity was similar, apart from increased bladder, bowel and sexual toxicity, in the Escalated Group during a short immediate post-radiotherapy period. Toxicity in both groups had abated by week 12. Using RTOG Acute Toxicity scores, cumulative Grade 2 bladder and bowel toxicity was 38% and 30% for Standard Group and 39% and 33% in Escalated Group, respectively. Urinary frequency (Royal Marsden Scale) improved in both groups from pre-androgen suppression to 6 months post-radiotherapy (p<0.001), but bowel and sexual functioning deteriorated. This pattern was supported by patient-completed assessments. Six months after starting radiotherapy the incidence of RTOG Grade > or = 2 side-effects was low (<1%); but there were six reports of rectal ulceration (6 Escalated Group), six haematuria (5 Escalated Group) and eight urethral stricture (6 Escalated Group). CONCLUSIONS: The two CFRT schedules with neo-adjuvant androgen suppression have broadly similar early toxicity profiles except for the immediate post-RT period. At 6 months and compared to before hormone therapy, bladder symptoms improved, whereas bowel and sexual symptoms worsened. These assessments of early treatment safety will be complemented by further follow-up to document late side-effects and efficacy.
PURPOSE: Surveillance is a standard management approach for stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). A randomized trial of two versus five computed tomography (CT) scans was performed to determine whether the number of scans influenced the proportion of patients relapsing with intermediate- or poor-prognosis disease at relapse. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage I NSGCT opting for surveillance were randomly assigned to chest and abdominal CT scans at either 3 and 12 or 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months, with all other investigations identical in the two arms. Three of five patients were allocated to the two-scan schedule. Four hundred patients were required. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-seven patients were allocated to a two-scan and 167 to five-scan policy. With a median follow-up of 40 months, 37 relapses (15%) have occurred in the two-scan arm and 33 (20%) in the five-scan arm. No patients had poor prognosis at relapse, but two (0.8%) of those relapsing in the two-scan arm had intermediate prognosis compared with 1 (0.6%) in the five-scan arm, a difference of 0.2% (90% CI, -1.2% to 1.6%). No deaths have been reported. CONCLUSION: This study can rule out with 95% probability an increase in the proportion of patients relapsing with intermediate- or poor-prognosis disease of more than 1.6% if they have two rather than five CT scans as part of their surveillance protocol. CT scans at 3 and 12 months after orchidectomy should be considered a reasonable option in low-risk patients.
BACKGROUND: In men with localised prostate cancer, conformal radiotherapy (CFRT) could deliver higher doses of radiation than does standard-dose conventional radical external-beam radiotherapy, and could improve long-term efficacy, potentially at the cost of increased toxicity. We aimed to present the first analyses of effectiveness from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. METHODS: The MRC RT01 trial included 843 men with localised prostate cancer who were randomly assigned to standard-dose CFRT or escalated-dose CFRT, both administered with neoadjuvant androgen suppression. Primary endpoints were biochemical-progression-free survival (bPFS), freedom from local progression, metastases-free survival, overall survival, and late toxicity scores. The toxicity scores were measured with questionnaires for physicians and patients that included the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), the Late Effects on Normal Tissue: Subjective/Objective/Management (LENT/SOM) scales, and the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA PCI) scales. Analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered at the Current Controlled Trials website http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN47772397. FINDINGS: Between January, 1998, and December, 2002, 843 men were randomly assigned to escalated-dose CFRT (n=422) or standard-dose CFRT (n=421). In the escalated group, the hazard ratio (HR) for bPFS was 0.67 (95% CI 0.53-0.85, p=0.0007). We noted 71% bPFS (108 cumulative events) and 60% bPFS (149 cumulative events) by 5 years in the escalated and standard groups, respectively. HR for clinical progression-free survival was 0.69 (0.47-1.02; p=0.064); local control was 0.65 (0.36-1.18; p=0.16); freedom from salvage androgen suppression was 0.78 (0.57-1.07; p=0.12); and metastases-free survival was 0.74 (0.47-1.18; p=0.21). HR for late bowel toxicity in the escalated group was 1.47 (1.12-1.92) according to the RTOG (grade >/=2) scale; 1.44 (1.16-1.80) according to the LENT/SOM (grade >/=2) scales; and 1.28 (1.03-1.60) according to the UCLA PCI (score >/=30) scale. 33% of the escalated and 24% of the standard group reported late bowel toxicity within 5 years of starting treatment. HR for late bladder toxicity according to the RTOG (grade >/=2) scale was 1.36 (0.90-2.06), but this finding was not supported by the LENT/SOM (grade >/=2) scales (HR 1.07 [0.90-1.29]), nor the UCLA PCI (score >/=30) scale (HR 1.05 [0.81-1.36]). INTERPRETATION: Escalated-dose CFRT with neoadjuvant androgen suppression seems clinically worthwhile in terms of bPFS, progression-free survival, and decreased use of salvage androgen suppression. This additional efficacy is offset by an increased incidence of longer term adverse events.
AIMS: Spinal cord compression (SCC) is the most significant complication due to skeletal metastasis from prostate cancer. The early detection of SCC is essential as the neurological status before treatment is the major determinant influencing outcome. The aim of this investigation was to determine the role of magnetic resonance imaging of the spine in detecting SCC or occult SCC in patients with metastatic prostate cancer with no functional neurological deficit (FND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 150 consecutive patients with metastatic prostate cancer and no FND, who had MRI of the spine from January 2001 to May 2005, was carried out. 'Overt SCC' on MRI was defined as the involvement or compression of either the spinal cord or the cauda equina by an epidural or intramedullary mass lesion and 'occult SCC' as metastatic disease causing impingement, indentation or loss of definition of the thecal sac, which were considered together for statistical purposes as radiological spinal cord compromise (rSCC). RESULTS: Twenty-four (16%) patients had overt SCC, whereas 17 (11.3%) patients had occult SCC. Seven patients had rSCC at multiple non-contiguous sites. The significant clinical determinants of rSCC on univariate analysis were extensive bone metastasis (P=0.005) and back pain (P=0.002). On multivariate analysis, both back pain (P=0.012) and extensive bone metastasis (P=0.047) significantly predicted for rSCC. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion (27.3%) of patients with metastatic prostate cancer may harbour overt or occult SCC in the absence of FND. MRI of the spine for the early diagnosis of SCC may be considered useful in patients with extensive skeletal metastasis and back pain.
BACKGROUND: The most frequent site of metastases from prostate cancer is bone. Adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment improves outcomes of patients with bone metastasis-negative breast cancer, but the effects of bisphosphonates on bone metastases in prostate cancer are not known. METHODS: We performed a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to determine whether a first-generation bisphosphonate could improve symptomatic bone metastasis-free survival (time to symptomatic bone metastases or death from prostate cancer) in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who were at high risk of developing bone metastases. Between June 1, 1994, and December 31, 1997, 508 men from 26 UK sites and one New Zealand site who were within 3 years of initial prostate cancer diagnosis with no evidence of metastases from current bone scanning were randomly assigned to daily oral sodium clodronate (2080 mg/day, n = 254) or placebo (n = 254) for a maximum of 5 years. Estimates of outcome risks were compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: The groups allocated to each treatment were well balanced. After a median follow-up of nearly 10 years, no evidence of benefit to the clodronate group was observed in terms of bone metastases-free survival (clodronate versus placebo, 80 events versus 68 events; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.88 to 1.68) or overall survival (clodronate versus placebo, 130 deaths versus 127 deaths; HR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.30). Adverse events, notably gastrointestinal problems and increased lactate dehydrogenase levels, were more frequent in the clodronate group than in the placebo group; otherwise, clodronate was well tolerated. Modification of trial drug dose was more frequent in the clodronate group than the placebo group (HR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.19). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant sodium clodronate does not modify the natural history of nonmetastatic prostate cancer.